Freeport Case: The 15 Arguidos List

At Joana Morais blog you can see the names of the 15 arguidos

One is José Socrates Pinto de Sousa - he is our PM

pm wrote:At Joana Morais blog you can see the names of the 15 arguidos

One is José Socrates Pinto de Sousa - he is our PM

Why is he an arguido?

Alpha wrote:

pm wrote:At Joana Morais blog you can see the names of the 15 arguidos

One is José Socrates Pinto de Sousa - he is our PM

Why is he an arguido?

there are suspections against him

PJ is searching him!

arguido is what Gerry, Kate and Murat were

pm wrote:

Alpha wrote:

pm wrote:At Joana Morais blog you can see the names of the 15 arguidos

One is José Socrates Pinto de Sousa - he is our PM

Why is he an arguido?

there are suspections against him

PJ is searching him!

arguido is what Gerry, Kate and Murat were

Do you know what he is suspected of doing? Money Laundring?

Alpha wrote:

pm wrote:

Alpha wrote:

pm wrote:At Joana Morais blog you can see the names of the 15 arguidos

One is José Socrates Pinto de Sousa - he is our PM

Why is he an arguido?

there are suspections against him

PJ is searching him!

arguido is what Gerry, Kate and Murat were

Do you know what he is suspected of doing? Money Laundring?

Corruption, favours, money!

Anonymous @ 17.30,

Very much so.

The most curious part is that Pinto Monteiro rushed out a press note on a Saturday afternoon, stating that there was no name of a Portuguese minister, either from the present or from a past government, in the PJ investigation.

Now either he was talking about another investigation, or there are at least two persons in the country with the same, rather uncommon name.

Not impossible, of course. Kind of extremely unlikely, but not impossible.

Other things that are not impossible:

. DNA matches of 15 out of 19 markers for more than one person

. dead people in holiday apartments

. death scents in rental car boots

. being in two places at the same time

. being invisible

Regarding the Freeport case we can say almost everything, that it has been long-drawn-out, that it's not understandable why people were not listened for a long time, why are the criminal investigations dragged on and so on.

This case, for all that involves, will have to be properly studied, and that will have its own timing. In the short term, however, many are wondering what to do with this investigation, given the potential contamination of the political and electoral cycle that involves.

Being this a problem of the Country, it is not bigger than what we would have in the case of not resisting to the temptation to wrap it up in a rushed solution, as an archival which results of a juridical filigree about an eventual prescription. 'Cooking' a quick archival would be, yet again, a profound blow on the independence of the Judicial Power.

Any wrong decision that is taken in the coming days, to 'tidy' the case before the arrival of the electoral cycle in full power, will be a biased way of demolishing the integrity of the criminal investigation.

That has happened the first time in the 'Golden Whistle', with the shameful removal of the coordinators of the investigation, then in the 'Maddie' process.

To allow that something similar happens again, this time by the Public Ministry order, will be a brutal attack to the sanity of the regime, which is what we already know ...


Source: Day to Day Column, Opinion Article in Correio da Manhã







+/-

+/-

by astro