Clarence Mitchell

Annabel wrote:http://www.iirpresentations.com/A1035/pdf/D2-0845-ClarenceMitchell.pdf

So despite it being a Confidential Agreement between the McCanns and the News of the World, Clarence was blabbing about it in 2009.

As a matter of interest have you seen this?

"On 14 September 2008, the News of the World published substantial, “exclusive” extracts from the diary kept by Kate McCann at the time her daughter, Madeleine, was abducted.

In fact, Mrs McCann did not consent to the publication of this deeply personal, private material and only learned of what had happened after the newspaper had been published.

The News of the World assures Mrs McCann, and she accepts, that it acted in good faith and had no wish to invade her privacy or cause distress. The newspaper immediately removed the article from its website, has published a full apology for its error and has agreed to make a donation to be used by Mrs McCann in the search for her missing daughter.

Mrs McCann wishes to make clear that she had not consented and does not consent to the publication of her diary or of any extracts from it. As such, in the event that her wishes in this regard are not respected, she will immediately take appropriate action in order to protect her rights"

http://www.carter-ruck.com/Miscellaneous/Kate%20McCann%20Diary%20

Above was published in 2008 - note the paragraph that says

"The News of the World assures Mrs McCann, and she accepts, that it acted in good faith and had no wish to invade her privacy or cause distress."

So Kate in 2008 "accepts, that it acted in good faith" then brings it up a Leveson as being "mentally raped" when it all had been agreed then?

A bit hurry propaganda. The last chapter is not written.

I got bored part-way through: What we need is a Summative Overview.

What a crappy looking powerpoint presentation. Clarence needs to work harder on his IT skills.