Questions for DCI Redwood

If you truly believe Madeleine was abducted, do you not think that the Mccanns ignoring advice and drawing attention to her colomba would have put her life in danger and any "abductor" would have killed her (thus trashing your theory that she is still alive)?

What have you been doing for the last 12 months?

Has the desired outcome of the review already been determined and are you working backwards to ensure that the 'evidence' fits with that conclusion?

did it really take 12 months and 29 detective to announce that Madeleine could be alive...... have your read Martin Grimes reports and watched the videos.

what information have your provided to K McC to enable her to write her "epilogue".
is this review really secret or is it only for theMcCs and snippets saying nothing, dead or alive, for the rest of us
will you clarify what the 195 investigative opportunities are, how many are from mediums and the like; which are not taken seriously normally.
did you agree the content and the timing of the media campaign with K and G McC
why is it necessary to have a media campaign incorporating press tv etc to announce that Madeleine is alive or dead and give another age progression photofit when previous ones appear not to have been successful?

are you aware of the implications your review will have on the cases of other missing children; is it your intention to use this review as a template to further cases of other missing children. will your colleagues in other forces have access to the age progression facilites and how often have these proved successful.

kitti wrote:Have you been sized yet for a straight jacket as your obviously insane if you believe the mccanns.



Did you actually go to Portimao to show these '195 potential investigative leads' to the Portuguese police and can you still hear them laughing?


How did you keep a straight face (well actually you didn't some off the time) when you came on t.v. spouting your garbage expecting US to believe.....?


How did you feel when you went home that night after that interview, were you able to look into yours wifes eyes KNOWING that you lied for the mccanns?


And lastly, when you kissed your children that night, did you feel comftable knowing that the child you were supposedly to be getting justice for and lied about to protect her neglecting parents earlier in that day would never say goodnight to her daddy ever again, never see the moon or stars and never get excited about father
Christmas again?

I think these 195 potential investigative leads are maybe a figure plucked out of the air to justify the obscene amount of money being spent on one missing child.There are many parents out there who have never had the help or the positive exposure afforded to the MCcanns, is one child more important than another, is this parents loss more devastating than other parents of missing kids?.and what of the contradictions of all concerned in this mystery has that been investigated, are the dogs to be ignored , their findiings sorry indications are they to be dismissed .Are the McCanns and the rest of the Tapas 7 part of this review and if not why not.The Tapas 7 and the Ms were the last people to see Madeleine before the vanishing and strangely they can’t seem to remember when she was last seen , are these facts being reviewed lets hope so , lets hope all these millions being spent looking into the vanishing of one child does’nt turn out to be a job half done , because its about time we were told the truth to justify the money being spent on this which is being met by the taxpayer and i think we deserve the truth so a child can rest in peace.

Do you have any views; strong, indifferent or otherwise as to the reasons a 'grieving' mother would refuse to answer just one question concerning the disappearance of her missing child, let alone refuse to answer 48! Or does that not even strike you as odd?

Were you aware of the many conspiracy theories and were you prepared for the onslaught of criticism you would have from the conspiracy theorists.?

Didn't your words (she's either alive or sadly dead) sound ridiculously pathetic to you when you were rehearsing in front of your mirror? Did it take the full 2 millions to reach that conclusion?

Is it true that Portuguese police were reported to have examined worldwide media reporting of the case and concluded that the international “sightings” were part of a deliberate campaign of misinformation ~ are you aware of this and have you seen the evidence of this?

Have you read the dossier of information supplied by Tony Bennett and the investigative department of the madeleine foundation, and has that dossier had any influence on your beliefs?

It was noted that the running total for the Fund disappeared from the official website, the Fund was
also being marketed as if it was a charity, C.Mitchell also asked the public to put money into an envelope and send to Kate and Gerry, money also spent on dodgy PIs and mortgage payments, have you asked the Fraud Squad to investigate the Fund in view of the fact that the public would appear to have been misled as to the purpose of the Fund.

why tell porkies on crime watch - norty norty

mara thon wrote:quote kitty.......Have you been sized yet for a straight jacket as your obviously insane if you believe the mccanns.

malena stool wrote:Do you have any views; strong, indifferent or otherwise as to the reasons a 'grieving' mother would refuse to answer just one question concerning the disappearance of her missing child, let alone refuse to answer 48! Or does that not even strike you as odd?

Now that is a bit harsh! Kate did answer one question in that interview: "When asked if she is aware of the fact that by not replying to the questions asked, she places the investigation, which seeks to find out what happened to her daughter, at risk, she replied yes, if that is what the investigation thinks."

jinvta wrote:

malena stool wrote:Do you have any views; strong, indifferent or otherwise as to the reasons a 'grieving' mother would refuse to answer just one question concerning the disappearance of her missing child, let alone refuse to answer 48! Or does that not even strike you as odd?

Now that is a bit harsh! Kate did answer one question in that interview: "When asked if she is aware of the fact that by not replying to the questions asked, she places the investigation, which seeks to find out what happened to her daughter, at risk, she replied yes, if that is what the investigation thinks."

Ooooops, sorry jinvta, I must hang my head in shame.... a bit of a disingenuous suggestion on my part. (I wonder if I could perhaps become a spin doctor??????)