Chelsea Hoffman

http://www.chelseahoffman.com/2012/05/was-madeleine-mccann-murdered-analysis.html

Don't know if this is new but, I haven't seen it before.

Interesting, thanks.

However, the evidence that is available just doesn't support the idea of any form of abduction occurring. All that remains is the loud protests of the family claiming that she had to have been abducted, even though there had to have only been a two-three minute window of opportunity for any type of abductor to pull this off without leaving any signs of forensic evidence identifying him, her or them.


It just doesn't jive, folks.

Nope. Never has.

And`surely "window of opportunity" should read "shutter of opportunity"?

The profiler rather lays themselves open by only relating part of the DNA story. It is well documented FSS later declared the results inconclusive. To ignore the fact undermines the findings.

If SY are saying that the window off opportunity was 'longer' than the mccanns 'whooshed clunk' , does that mean that the mccanns will be prosecuted for allowing Madeleine to be 'abducted'?

Madeleine McCann Is Not Likely Alive
May 03, 2012 03:35 AM EDT
3 people recommend this | comments: 3

It's not very likely that Madeleine McCann is alive, nor is it likely that she was even alive when she was reported missing five years ago. This is a case similar to the Amanda Knox trial with the PR campaigns flubbing up the facts and possibly leading to the flaws in the investigation. It doesn't help that the parents aren't doing their best to be convincing in all of this either. This article might not be popular if you're not privy to the facts or if you're blindly supportive of the McCanns even in the face of evidence.

Kate and Gerry McCann are putting themselves in the media eye again, but no amount of money pandering and publicity for book sales is going to change the facts in this case. The facts are that there is more than enough evidence that Madeleine McCann never left apartment 5A alive five years ago.

First of all, like many cases in The States that raise concern, cadaver and blood dogs 'hit' on the scent of a dead body in the McCanns' car and apartment in Portugal. No other similar evidence has been found anywhere. As you can see in the videos here, Kate and Gerry McCann have always downright refused to acknowledge or discuss the credible forensic evidence in this case.

There are other issues in the disappearance of little Maddy that bring to question the credibility of whether or not she's alive, although the forensic evidence is more than enough most of the time. There are several questions that Kate McCann was asked by investigators in Portugal back when she was named a suspect in her daughter's disappearance. Kate McCann flat-out refused to answer 48 questions that investigators asked, even after acknowledging that she knew that it would hinder their investigation. Here are some of those questions:

Is it true or not that in England you went so far as thinking about handing over Madeleine to a relative to look after?
At home (in England) did you give medication to your children and what kind of medication?
Did you have any responsibility or involvement in the disappearance of your daughter Madeleine?

The fact that the McCanns have refused to answer specific questions even during the preliminary investigation is just worrisome to say the least. The idea that they are continuing this charade of the young girl being alive is heartbreaking. Either they are completely fooled and desperately clinging to hope, or they're both a couple narcissists on the same level as Casey Anthony. That's just a speculation.


Crime analyst and profiler Chelsea Hoffman can be found on The Huffington Post, Chelsea Hoffman: Case to Case and many other outlets. Follow @TheRealChelseaH on Twitter or click here to contact Chelsea directly.

"The facts are that there is more than enough evidence that Madeleine McCann never left apartment 5A alive five years ago."

Really? Then why on earth are we - and the pros - still hotly debating and why have their been no arrests and Trials?

Answer: Because while there is enough Intelligence, there is not sufficient Evidence.

We all sympathise with the thrust of what you say - and it isn't exactly original in any way - but it really isn't helpful when you make such fundamental errors.

On the other hand, one could argue that there really is sufficient Evidence - but it just hasn't been fully uncovered and collated.

Even Healy & McCann deserve the same standard of proof that we in Europe expect - that way there is no comeback; No get out; No Appeal.

Or we could argue that there is more than sufficient evidence, it's been uncovered and collated, and it's been suppressed. By person or persons unknown, and for reason or reasons unknown.

Iris wrote:Or we could argue that there is more than sufficient evidence, it's been uncovered and collated, and it's been suppressed. By person or persons unknown, and for reason or reasons unknown.

I very much doubt that.

Conspiracy on the required scale is massively unlikely - one person having a bad day could blow the whole game.

I asked Chelsea to get involved in the case as I admired her work on other missing children for a while. She is doing an awesome job & getting McCann trolls all of a tizzy in the process.

Chelsea is just like us. She only wants the truth - not some spin that suits.

The End Is Nigh wrote:

Iris wrote:Or we could argue that there is more than sufficient evidence, it's been uncovered and collated, and it's been suppressed. By person or persons unknown, and for reason or reasons unknown.

I very much doubt that.

Conspiracy on the required scale is massively unlikely - one person having a bad day could blow the whole game.

I certainly believe that some stuff at least is being suppressed, for whatever reason.