NOT IN MY CHILDREN'S LIFETIMES......Dr. Martin roberts

EXCLUSIVE to mccannfiles.com

By Dr Martin Roberts
13 February 2013


NOT IN MY CHILDREN's LIFETIMES...

...would I wish to see Dr Gerry McCann's, or for that matter his wife's voice influence the legislation of this land. And no, I am not just an envious forker. I'm forking angry. Angry that anyone should attempt to gain social or other advantage at the expense of a child's life (see Shakespeare's Henry V, Act 4 Scene 7). Let it not be forgotten that Gerry McCann the orator is one and the same person as he who, since early May 2007, has done more to ensure that his missing daughter stays missing than he has ever done to repatriate her.

For the benefit of those who might need reminding:

Action

PJ instruction – 'No media!'

Portuguese legal requirement – judicial secrecy.



Early reports of sighting in Malta

Co-operate fully with investigating authorities



Appeal for information via a web site
McCann response

Alert UK broadcasters

Disclose details to David James Smith

Embark on campaign of 'phone calls home on 07/09/2007

Visit Spain

Illegally deploy private investigators

Fly home after questioning and appoint an extradition lawyer

Incorporate a faux contact button



Etcetera, etcetera.

Gerry McCann has, it seems, spoken of his fears that David Cameron might be prepared to water down the proposals of the Leveson enquiry. "If our testimony was in vain it would be a permanent stain on the reputation of this government," he said.

As permanent a stain, no doubt, as once appeared on a pair of child's pyjamas six years ago. Almost. Still, it would be on this government's reputation. Unlike the previous administration of arrivistes, who have the McCanns personally to thank for the stain on theirs; not one but two Labour prime ministers saluted the McCann flag. Small wonder then that the campaigning doctor is tilting at the other side. He obviously knows on which side his bread has been buttered.

Apparently Dr Gerry McCann and his wife Kate have been harassed by newspapers which made "profit from misery." Unlike Kate McCann's novel, Madeleine, which, as much a work of fiction as anything else, largely excludes the subject it purports to discuss and proudly announces via a 'flash' on the book's jacket, 'All royalties donated to Madeleine's fund.' (That's the fund which has been paying for those two 'searchers' long since given their P45s). Strange, but there appears to be no itemisation of 'author's royalties' within the company (i.e., the fund) accounts. As others have pointed out, 'book income' (after publication) doesn't seem quite the appropriate definition. Perhaps someone should break it gently to Transworld publishers that, should any or all of these royalties have actually gone elsewhere, then they could find themselves to have been party to mis-representation, since the inducement to purchase was clearly printed by them and not affixed to the product subsequently.

But we are considering profit from misery are we not? Would anyone care to weigh the misery of the McCanns against that of their missing daughter, who benefits not one iota from book sales, who never got to tour Europe, holiday in Canada, visit the USA or Scandinavia? And never will.

He said: "To keep his promises all he (Prime Minster David Cameron) has to do is follow what Leveson said and put the Leveson recommendations into law through parliament without meddling in back door dealing and without checking that the press is happy with it."

All he has to do? Sounds a tad more complicated than posting a letter to the Portuguese Justice department requesting they re-open the investigation into Madeleine's disappearance. Whatever happened to 'We would be more than happy for the case to be reopened?' 'More than happy' is clearly not happy enough for some. And what’s all this about 'back door dealing?' Is Dr McCann speaking from experience here?

Referring to the Parliamentary Select Committee on the media (2010) Dr Gerry, who believes his 'phone has never been hacked, told his audience at the Hacked Off Conference:

"Three years later, I see little remorse, no contrition. Sections of the press are still in denial. The sick culture has not changed, and they can't be trusted to change it of their own accord.

"If you look at the reporting of the Leveson Inquiry and the behaviour of some newspapers since then, it's clear that they aren't sorry and they still think they should not have to answer to anyone when they publish harmful lies and distortions."

This coming from someone who clearly took the hypocritic oath.

Six years after the McCanns as good as admitted child abandonment, but nothing else, there is little remorse, no contrition. It's clear that they aren't sorry and they still think they should not have to answer to anyone when they publish harmful lies and distortions (such as resulted from their joint performance before the Leveson inquiry - see 'Digging Beneath the Surface,' McCannFiles 28.11. 2011, and that poor excuse for a 'tear jerker' written by Kate).

======================

Apologies if this has been posted before...I havn't read it until now.

"If our testimony was in vain it would be a permanent stain on the reputation of this government," he said.


The permanent stain on the government's reputation is that they have given extra special treatment to the McCanns and wasted millions of tax payers money on them, proving that it isn't what you know, it's who you know !

mara thon wrote:"If our testimony was in vain it would be a permanent stain on the reputation of this government," he said.


The permanent stain on the government's reputation is that they have given extra special treatment to the McCanns and wasted millions of tax payers money on them, proving that it isn't what you know, it's who you know !

Too true mara_thon, will this "investigation" hinder the Trial?

Something is really bugging me and I am wondering if anyone else saw it. Early this morning I was half watching skynews about the latest news on Syria
and the next thing , a Woman was walking by a desk as if she was going to sit down on a chair and she looked like JKRowling, I missed the first bit only heard the Studio Reporter say "McCanns." Iv'e looked in all the papers, ...nothing !!!

It's to do with the press regulation re leveson..


Wow 15 people have signed Including the mccanns and Rowling asking Cameron NOT to side with the papers.


Must off been hard Gerry getting 15 people to sign lol

Cameron can't afford to side with hacked off .....Murdoch owns him body and soul......

kitti wrote:It's to do with the press regulation re leveson..


Wow 15 people have signed Including the mccanns and Rowling asking Cameron NOT to side with the papers.


Must off been hard Gerry getting 15 people to sign lol

Cameron can't afford to side with hacked off .....Murdoch owns him body and soul......

kitti , the McCanns weren't even hacked. Gerry managed to give evidence about Press intrusion and we later learn he is possibly being groomed by the Labour Party to get a seat in the next Election. There was a rumour that Gerry was a Fund raiser for the Labour Party and it all fits and that is why the McCanns got so much help from the start Tony Blair, John Buck, Family Lawyers Clarence Mitchell, Gordon Brown . They had their personal Phone Numbers.

Anger well expressed by Dr Martin Roberts! 

Any one have any speculation or clue as to who he might be yet? or what sort of Doctor he might be?

Loopdaloop wrote:Anger well expressed by Dr Martin Roberts! 

Any one have any speculation or clue as to who he might be yet? or what sort of Doctor he might be?

I think we tried once before but acknowledged Dr Martin is articulate, obviously as interested in the case as we are, that was about it. If your'e reading this Dr Martin I hope you will enlighten us when the case is closed and the McCanns in jail.