Re: Amaral Defence Fund

Guest Wed 3 Feb - 19:39

MCXLIII wrote:
xklamation wrote:hi, good morning to all, update on the solidarity account at PJGA

Projecto Justiça Gonçalo Amaral – Conta de Solidariedade
Informação 18 de Janeiro de 2010

Em 18 de Janeiro de 2010, a Conta de Solidariedade contabiliza um saldo de EUR 5718,45.

Total de donativos via PayPal: EUR 2819,49
Total de donativos por débito directo/transferência bancária: EUR 4400,00
Total de donativos angariados em jantar de solidariedade (14Jan2010): EUR 500,00

Transferência bancária para o Dr. António Cabrita, advogado de Gonçalo Amaral: EUR 2000,00
Despesas bancárias: EUR 1,04

Os Cidadãos pela Defesa dos Direitos e Liberdades - Projecto Justiça Gonçalo Amaral agradecem a todos quantos já contribuíram para esta iniciativa.

----"----

Project Justice Gonçalo Amaral – Solidarity Account
Information 18 January 2010

On the 18th of January, 2010, the Solidarity Account's balance is of EUR 5718,45.

PayPal donations, total: EUR 2819,49
Donations by direct debit/bank wire transfer, total: EUR 4400,00
Donations from fundraising dinner (14Jan2010): EUR 500,00

Bank transfer to Dr. António Cabrita, Gonçalo Amaral's lawyer: EUR 2000,00
Bank account expenses: EUR 1,04

The Citizens in Defence of Rights and Freedoms – Project Justice Gonçalo Amaral would like to thank everyone who has already contributed to this initiative.

http://pjga.blogspot.com/2010/01/conta-de-solidariedade-informacao.html

2.000 Euros for legal expenses?
That doesn't even cover the administrative costs of such a lengthy and complex process.
António Cabrita must be working for free and probably putting money from his own pocket.

Thanks JM. That should put a cork on some people's mouth.

ETA. Hey sans_souci. The Solidarity Account is a bit low.
Can you make another donnation now that your doubts have been cleared?

Good post

**AnnaEsse** Wed 3 Feb - 19:48

Earth calling sans_souci. Come in sans_souci. The information you requested has been sitting here for a while. Any comments?

**fred** Wed 3 Feb - 19:53

AnnaEsse wrote:Earth calling sans_souci. Come in sans_souci. The information you requested has been sitting here for a while. Any comments?

Well Anna obviously not! I wonder why?

**kitti** Wed 3 Feb - 19:54

Shes been beamed up by Scotty!!!

**AnnaEsse** Wed 3 Feb - 19:55

fred wrote:
AnnaEsse wrote:Earth calling sans_souci. Come in sans_souci. The information you requested has been sitting here for a while. Any comments?

Well Anna obviously not! I wonder why?

Me too. All that whinging and casting aspersions and he/she/it doesn't have the decency to make a comment after Joana has logged in here to bring the info.

**AnnaEsse** Wed 3 Feb - 19:56

kitti wrote:Shes been beamed up by Scotty!!!

Guest Fri 5 Feb - 7:00

AnnaEsse wrote:Earth calling sans_souci. Come in sans_souci. The information you requested has been sitting here for a while. Any comments?

She's around the forum now Amaral Defence Fund - Page 3 873702

maybe you'll get a reply.

**AnnaEsse** Fri 5 Feb - 7:30

Allstar wrote:
AnnaEsse wrote:Earth calling sans_souci. Come in sans_souci. The information you requested has been sitting here for a while. Any comments?

She's around the forum now maybe you'll get a reply.

No chance! He/she/it is very keen to point out where others get their facts wrong, but doesn't appear to be too keen to review their own thinking in the light of information provided.

sans_souci Fri 5 Feb - 9:30

Well, I have of course responded to the information in the appropriate place. It is not unreasonable for donors to expect some updates, especially as it was part of the original manifesto.

**AnnaEsse** Fri 5 Feb - 16:46

sans_souci wrote:Well, I have of course responded to the information in the appropriate place. It is not unreasonable for donors to expect some updates, especially as it was part of the original manifesto.

So, not here, on the thread you started? Where is the "appropriate place," then if not on this thread?

ETA: Yes, I've just checked to make sure I didn't imagine it. You asked a question here. So, here would seem like an appropriate place to respond.

**the one and only big_l** Fri 5 Feb - 16:48

AnnaEsse wrote:
sans_souci wrote:Well, I have of course responded to the information in the appropriate place. It is not unreasonable for donors to expect some updates, especially as it was part of the original manifesto.

So, not here, on the thread you started? Where is the "appropriate place," then if not on this thread?

on his time sheet to team mccann Amaral Defence Fund - Page 3 23324

**AnnaEsse** Fri 5 Feb - 16:49

the one and only big_l wrote:
AnnaEsse wrote:
sans_souci wrote:Well, I have of course responded to the information in the appropriate place. It is not unreasonable for donors to expect some updates, especially as it was part of the original manifesto.

So, not here, on the thread you started? Where is the "appropriate place," then if not on this thread?
on his time sheet to team mccann

With expenses claim for hurt feelings on other threads too I imagine.

sans_souci Fri 5 Feb - 17:07

Of course.

I asked the question here on the 28th, having been unable to find an answer via the fund website, and the update was eventually provided on the fund website on the 30th and here on the 31st. I responded on the fund website to thank them (having eventually found a way of doing so).

My profound apologies for any distress caused to my many friends and admirers on this site, who I realise must have been worried by my lack of response. I can assure them that I am quite well.

**AnnaEsse** Fri 5 Feb - 17:09

sans_souci wrote:Of course.

I asked the question here on the 28th, having been unable to find an answer via the fund website, and the update was eventually provided on the fund website on the 30th and here on the 31st. I responded on the fund website to thank them (having eventually found a way of doing so).

My profound apologies for any distress caused to my many friends and admirers on this site, who I realise must have been worried by my lack of response. I can assure them that I am quite well.

Sans, I am not at all interested in your health, as you probably know, but it does seem to be good manners to respond in the same place as you asked the question.

**the one and only big_l** Fri 5 Feb - 17:10

sans_souci wrote:Of course.

I asked the question here on the 28th, having been unable to find an answer via the fund website, and the update was eventually provided on the fund website on the 30th and here on the 31st. I responded on the fund website to thank them (having eventually found a way of doing so).

My profound apologies for any distress caused to my many friends and admirers on this site, who I realise must have been worried by my lack of response. I can assure them that I am quite well.

glad to hear your ok sans Amaral Defence Fund - Page 3 25346

kate and gerry have enough on their plate without having to look for a replacement before their flight to portugal

**AnnaEsse** Fri 5 Feb - 17:19

the one and only big_l wrote:
sans_souci wrote:Of course.

I asked the question here on the 28th, having been unable to find an answer via the fund website, and the update was eventually provided on the fund website on the 30th and here on the 31st. I responded on the fund website to thank them (having eventually found a way of doing so).

My profound apologies for any distress caused to my many friends and admirers on this site, who I realise must have been worried by my lack of response. I can assure them that I am quite well.
glad to hear your ok sans kate and gerry have enough on their plate without having to look for a replacement before their flight to portugal

You're all heart big_l.

**the one and only big_l** Fri 5 Feb - 17:22

AnnaEsse wrote:
the one and only big_l wrote:
sans_souci wrote:Of course.

I asked the question here on the 28th, having been unable to find an answer via the fund website, and the update was eventually provided on the fund website on the 30th and here on the 31st. I responded on the fund website to thank them (having eventually found a way of doing so).

My profound apologies for any distress caused to my many friends and admirers on this site, who I realise must have been worried by my lack of response. I can assure them that I am quite well.
glad to hear your ok sans kate and gerry have enough on their plate without having to look for a replacement before their flight to portugal

You're all heart big_l.

**Claudia79** Fri 5 Feb - 17:24

If posters don't intend to acknowledge the answers to their questions (or only doing so after being pressured to) then I suggest they don't start threads asking those same questions to start with.

**Claudia79** Fri 5 Feb - 17:24

the one and only big_l wrote:
sans_souci wrote:Of course.

I asked the question here on the 28th, having been unable to find an answer via the fund website, and the update was eventually provided on the fund website on the 30th and here on the 31st. I responded on the fund website to thank them (having eventually found a way of doing so).

My profound apologies for any distress caused to my many friends and admirers on this site, who I realise must have been worried by my lack of response. I can assure them that I am quite well.
glad to hear your ok sans kate and gerry have enough on their plate without having to look for a replacement before their flight to portugal

**AnnaEsse** Fri 5 Feb - 17:49

Claudia79 wrote:If posters don't intend to acknowledge the answers to their questions (or only doing so after being pressured to) then I suggest they don't start threads asking those same questions to start with.

Exactly! If they haven't got the decency to acknowledge the answers, then they should keep their questions to themselves.

**Claudia79** Fri 5 Feb - 17:58

AnnaEsse wrote:
Claudia79 wrote:If posters don't intend to acknowledge the answers to their questions (or only doing so after being pressured to) then I suggest they don't start threads asking those same questions to start with.

Exactly! If they haven't got the decency to acknowledge the answers, then they should keep their questions to themselves.

Absolutely. Unless... Oh well, never mind. Amaral Defence Fund - Page 3 192282

Sponsored content