Compliant regarding Cipri-case has been DISMISSED today, 17.3.10

Lilemor wrote:Please please let us wait for an official source.
I only picked up the news from another forum.

Hi, Lilemor.
I confirmed it with Mr Amaral himself.

wjk wrote:This is great news and has really cheered me up tonight
All my best wishes to Mr Amaral and his family xx

Lilemore, Claudia has it confirmed by Mr Amaral

Thank you!

AnnaEsse wrote:Interesting time for you to stop by, Jack. Have you been loitering for some time or just happened to look in now?

Sounds like another conspiracy.

Claudia79 wrote:

jack wrote:The judge looked at the evidence and came to a conclusion based on it , as happened in the case versus the McCanns. This shows that there is not a conspiracy against Amaral, as some have suggested. He's just lost 2 out of the 3 cases hes been involved in based purely on the evidence.

You're ill-informed, I'm afraid.
The cases you mentioned have been appealed. When the appeals run out (as in the Cipriano case) then you can say he lost them.
And by the way, following your somewhat twisted logic, it's actually 2 out of 5 as he was the coordinator of the Cipriano case and the loony lawyer managed to get Leonor's conviction maintained (instead of overturned) and see an appeal for a new trial turned down.
Sorry, didn't mean to hurt your feelings.

Ohhhh! I think I might be psychic! I have this feeling that we might be about to witness an influx of trolls. We have Jack here and on the guest forum, we've had someone say they'd join if the banning of someone were to be confirmed. Get ready folks, just in case they're coming out from under that bridge.

Very great news... some common sense at last!


(Yours to savour Sr. Amaral! )

AnnaEsse wrote:

Claudia79 wrote:

jack wrote:The judge looked at the evidence and came to a conclusion based on it , as happened in the case versus the McCanns. This shows that there is not a conspiracy against Amaral, as some have suggested. He's just lost 2 out of the 3 cases hes been involved in based purely on the evidence.

You're ill-informed, I'm afraid.
The cases you mentioned have been appealed. When the appeals run out (as in the Cipriano case) then you can say he lost them.
And by the way, following your somewhat twisted logic, it's actually 2 out of 5 as he was the coordinator of the Cipriano case and the loony lawyer managed to get Leonor's conviction maintained (instead of overturned) and see an appeal for a new trial turned down.
Sorry, didn't mean to hurt your feelings.

Ohhhh! I think I might be psychic! I have this feeling that we might be about to witness an influx of trolls. We have Jack here and on the guest forum, we've had someone say they'd join if the banning of someone were to be confirmed. Get ready folks, just in case they're coming out from under that bridge.

Oh my, have you thought about opening a psychic business in Madeira?

That's fantastic

jack wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:Interesting time for you to stop by, Jack. Have you been loitering for some time or just happened to look in now?

Sounds like another conspiracy.

What? Asking you why you happened along just now?

Claudia79 wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

Claudia79 wrote:

jack wrote:The judge looked at the evidence and came to a conclusion based on it , as happened in the case versus the McCanns. This shows that there is not a conspiracy against Amaral, as some have suggested. He's just lost 2 out of the 3 cases hes been involved in based purely on the evidence.

You're ill-informed, I'm afraid.
The cases you mentioned have been appealed. When the appeals run out (as in the Cipriano case) then you can say he lost them.
And by the way, following your somewhat twisted logic, it's actually 2 out of 5 as he was the coordinator of the Cipriano case and the loony lawyer managed to get Leonor's conviction maintained (instead of overturned) and see an appeal for a new trial turned down.
Sorry, didn't mean to hurt your feelings.

Ohhhh! I think I might be psychic! I have this feeling that we might be about to witness an influx of trolls. We have Jack here and on the guest forum, we've had someone say they'd join if the banning of someone were to be confirmed. Get ready folks, just in case they're coming out from under that bridge.

Oh my, have you thought about opening a psychic business in Madeira?

Madeira sounds like a nice place, but i think I might offer my services to one of the tabloids as Mystic Mog!

AnnaEsse wrote:

Claudia79 wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

Claudia79 wrote:

jack wrote:The judge looked at the evidence and came to a conclusion based on it , as happened in the case versus the McCanns. This shows that there is not a conspiracy against Amaral, as some have suggested. He's just lost 2 out of the 3 cases hes been involved in based purely on the evidence.

You're ill-informed, I'm afraid.
The cases you mentioned have been appealed. When the appeals run out (as in the Cipriano case) then you can say he lost them.
And by the way, following your somewhat twisted logic, it's actually 2 out of 5 as he was the coordinator of the Cipriano case and the loony lawyer managed to get Leonor's conviction maintained (instead of overturned) and see an appeal for a new trial turned down.
Sorry, didn't mean to hurt your feelings.

Ohhhh! I think I might be psychic! I have this feeling that we might be about to witness an influx of trolls. We have Jack here and on the guest forum, we've had someone say they'd join if the banning of someone were to be confirmed. Get ready folks, just in case they're coming out from under that bridge.

Oh my, have you thought about opening a psychic business in Madeira?

Madeira sounds like a nice place, but i think I might offer my services to one of the tabloids as Mystic Mog!

Rep points from me for Claudia79 and Lilemor thanks both for your information. (Cant find the thanks button)

Thank you Lilemor & Claudia xx
Brilliant News !!! A rep point for both of you.
Viva Senor Goncalo Amaral



All my very best wishes Rose xxx

Claudia79 nezxt time you speak, text, email or whatever to Goncalo Amaral would you please say how pleased we all are for him. Many thanks.

Time for another fun run.

tanszi wrote:Rep points from me for Claudia79 and Lilemor thanks both for your information. (Cant find the thanks button)

Thanks, Tanszi. My true compensation was to confirm the news.

Claudia79 wrote:

jack wrote:The judge looked at the evidence and came to a conclusion based on it , as happened in the case versus the McCanns. This shows that there is not a conspiracy against Amaral, as some have suggested. He's just lost 2 out of the 3 cases hes been involved in based purely on the evidence.

You're ill-informed, I'm afraid.
The cases you mentioned have been appealed. When the appeals run out (as in the Cipriano case) then you can say he lost them.
And by the way, following your somewhat twisted logic, it's actually 2 out of 5 as he was the coordinator of the Cipriano case and the loony lawyer managed to get Leonor's conviction maintained (instead of overturned) and see an appeal for a new trial turned down.
Sorry, didn't mean to hurt your feelings.

Seems like I hit a raw nerve . Actually I can say he lost two cases , fact at present, unless of course you cannot stand freedom of speech.

SteveT wrote:Time for another fun run.

Something will have to be done now! What next? I know! The Pope is visiting an airport in the midlands. The McCanns could book a front row seat to see their friend Benedict and make sure the press are right beside them!

jack wrote:

Claudia79 wrote:

jack wrote:The judge looked at the evidence and came to a conclusion based on it , as happened in the case versus the McCanns. This shows that there is not a conspiracy against Amaral, as some have suggested. He's just lost 2 out of the 3 cases hes been involved in based purely on the evidence.

You're ill-informed, I'm afraid.
The cases you mentioned have been appealed. When the appeals run out (as in the Cipriano case) then you can say he lost them.
And by the way, following your somewhat twisted logic, it's actually 2 out of 5 as he was the coordinator of the Cipriano case and the loony lawyer managed to get Leonor's conviction maintained (instead of overturned) and see an appeal for a new trial turned down.
Sorry, didn't mean to hurt your feelings.

Seems like I hit a raw nerve . Actually I can say he lost two cases , fact at present, unless of course you cannot stand freedom of speech.

Hit a raw nerve by being misinformed? No. We're used to people turning up with their misinformation.

Next!

Rep point from me Lilemor. (Är du svensk?)

steveT, AnnaEsse gosh that would be fun ....... the Pope is preparing himself to meet K and G ..... I think not, yet I feel a new cardi coming on.

jack wrote:The judge looked at the evidence and came to a conclusion based on it , as happened in the case versus the McCanns. This shows that there is not a conspiracy against Amaral, as some have suggested. He's just lost 2 out of the 3 cases hes been involved in based purely on the evidence.

Just logged on, and have seen this great news!!!

Thank God justice has been done in this case!

jack wrote:

Claudia79 wrote:

jack wrote:The judge looked at the evidence and came to a conclusion based on it , as happened in the case versus the McCanns. This shows that there is not a conspiracy against Amaral, as some have suggested. He's just lost 2 out of the 3 cases hes been involved in based purely on the evidence.

You're ill-informed, I'm afraid.
The cases you mentioned have been appealed. When the appeals run out (as in the Cipriano case) then you can say he lost them.
And by the way, following your somewhat twisted logic, it's actually 2 out of 5 as he was the coordinator of the Cipriano case and the loony lawyer managed to get Leonor's conviction maintained (instead of overturned) and see an appeal for a new trial turned down.
Sorry, didn't mean to hurt your feelings.

Seems like I hit a raw nerve . Actually I can say he lost two cases , fact at present, unless of course you cannot stand freedom of speech.

Not at all.
I didn't mean to embarrass you, but the truth is that you are ignorant regarding the law in this country. If there is an appeal (by any of the parts) the case starts all over again. For instance, when Leonor Cipriano was convicted for the first time of murdering her daughter, her lawyer appealed immediately. At that time, calling her a convicted murderer was libellous, because she had appealed the case. Only after the appeals ran out could we call her a convicted child killer, which is what she actually is.
Next time, do some research first.
As for freedom of speech, I suspect you have no idea what that means. As a Portuguese citizen, I still remember.
Stay well.

tanszi wrote:Claudia79 nezxt time you speak, text, email or whatever to Goncalo Amaral would you please say how pleased we all are for him. Many thanks.

I will.
And he knows.

Wonderful news, God bless Mr Amaral and his family. Thanks for the information.