Missing Madeleine
Come join us...there's more inside you cannot see as a guest!

Why didn't the McCanns sue Halligen?

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Why didn't the McCanns sue Halligen?

Post  Panda on Thu 26 Jul - 11:44


Fraud suspect Kevin Richard Halligen allegedly posed as spy, cheating elites in US, London
by Hardlinemarxist

Some people knew him as Kevin. He told others he was Richard. Everyone could see he had money to burn, and most people thought he was a British spy. But nobody in Washington really knew Kevin Richard Halligen, not even the woman he pretended to marry.

Halligen now sits in a London prison, fighting extradition to the United States, where he faces felony fraud charges stemming from his days of extravagant living in Washington high society.

For about three years, until 2008, Halligen spent hundreds of thousands of dollars living large in Washington. He stayed in a Willard Hotel suite for months at a time and drank the days away at pricey Georgetown restaurants. He traveled everywhere in a chauffeur-driven Lincoln Town Car, set up high-tech offices in Herndon, Va., and bought a grand home in Great Falls, Va.

Smart, charming and favoring black turtlenecks and sunglasses, Halligen told everyone that he was a spy, or a former spy, or connected to spies. He told friends that he was under such deep cover that he took over his fiancee’s place as a “safe house.”

Virtually all of it, it turns out, was fabricated or exaggerated, according to associates who have since investigated his background. But with amazing ease and a perfect British accent, the diminutive Halligen schmoozed his way into Washington’s intelligence elite — Pentagon officials, influential lawyers and lobbyists, former CIA operatives.

And he took their money.

He set up shop as a corporate security consultant, offering his dubious “operational experience” in intelligence to solve delicate problems for customers working in dangerous places.

In a capital with a long history of spies, foreigners with shadowy backgrounds, big talkers and charlatans, Halligen didn’t set off any alarm bells at first, according to former associates. But that changed when they concluded that Halligen was taking money and not doing the work he promised.

The U.S. government obtained an indictment against him in 2009 on criminal charges of bilking a client out of $2.1 million, and judges in the District of Columbia and Virginia have ordered him to pay $6.5 million to former partners who claim he fleeced them.

Halligen, through his London lawyer, declined to comment as he fights extradition to the United States in British courts.

But in dozens of interviews in Washington and London, those who knew Halligen described how he created a trail of creditors, from lawyers to landlords to housekeepers. And they said he left a group of Washington insiders wondering how one charming and audacious hustler managed to seduce them all.

‘I was duped’

Halligen fooled London before he fooled Washington.

“I was duped,” said John Holmes, a retired British Army general who was head of the British military’s special forces.

Holmes said he met Halligen in 2002, when Halligen took an IT job at a private security consulting firm where Holmes was working after his military retirement.

Holmes, in an interview in his London office, said he knew Halligen was never a member of any intelligence service. But he worked on the periphery of that world as an engineer for companies that provided technical support — designing batteries, for example — to the British government and military.

But he was impressed with Halligen’s smarts and entrepreneurial spirit, so he said he helped him start his own firm, Red Defence International. Holmes said that over time he realized that Halligen was grossly exaggerating his background to clients and others and that he had an uncanny ability to keep his stories straight.

“He had an intellect that would instinctively allow him to decide what he would say to people and what he wouldn’t say,” Holmes said.

Other friends said Halligen had a habit of hearing spy stories and then repeating them later as tales of his own bravery. One friend said Halligen loved to show off a metal cigarette lighter with an inscription thanking him for helping in a secret rescue of hostages in Colombia.

“A real spy doesn’t do that,” said the friend, who asked not to be named.

Halligen’s taste for luxury was also getting him into trouble. Scarlett Guess, Halligen’s landlord in London, said Halligen rented three floors of her building for close to $20,000 a month, but paid only sporadically.

At the same time, his corporate bank statements, contained in court records in Washington, show that he was spending tens of thousands of dollars at such places as the five-star Stafford London Hotel and Les Ambassadeurs Club, a private casino where membership costs about $40,000 a year.

But before Holmes noticed the increasing warning signs, he said he backed Halligen’s application to join the Special Forces Club in central London, an exclusive private club for people with links to British intelligence.

That membership helped Halligen immensely as he set his sights on an ultra-lucrative security consultant mecca: Washington.

A high-level network

When Halligen breezed into Washington about 2005, one of his first calls, according to associates, was to Patton Boggs, the heavyweight law firm. He hired the firm to help set up his new U.S. business, Oakley International, which offered risk analysis and security advice to corporate customers.

A key contact at Patton Boggs was lobbyist John Garrett, a retired U.S. Marine colonel who serves as the firm’s senior defense policy adviser. Garrett declined to comment for this article, saying Patton Boggs does not discuss former clients.

Halligen used each new contact to methodically build up a high-level network. Garrett introduced Halligen to a number of key Washington establishment figures, including Noel Koch, who was a White House aide under President Richard Nixon and whom President Barack Obama appointed deputy undersecretary of defense.

“If John Garrett was vouching for him, that was good enough for me,” Koch said.

Koch recalled getting to know Halligen over boozy lunches at Ristorante La Perla on Pennsylvania Avenue NW.

Shown a photo of Halligen, who, 5-foot-6 and clean-cut, looks like a slightly elfin Boy Scout, La Perla owner Vittorio Testa recalled that he came in nearly every day. Testa said Halligen would sit on the outdoor patio smoking cigarettes and drinking heavily, often arriving at 11 a.m. and not leaving until 4.

“A very elegant man, always good manners,” Testa said.

Koch said he was amazed by Halligen’s lunchtime drinking.

“He’d say, ‘Let’s have martinis,’ and I’d have a martini, as would he,” Koch said. “Then we had another one, then he’d want a bottle of wine. We became fast friends over all those martinis.”

Koch was running a private security consulting company, and at one of their lunches, Halligen said he wanted to subscribe to his firm’s newsletter. Koch said that would cost him $15,000 and that Halligen made an extravagant show of overpaying.

“He wrote me a check for $20,000,” Koch said, “right there at the table.”

In the fall of 2006, Halligen still had money coming in from Red Defence in London, as well as his growing Washington business. But a big break came that September when two executives from a Dutch multinational firm, Trafigura, were arrested in Ivory Coast, accused of illegally dumping toxic waste.

Trafigura hired Halligen to help win release of the executives. Halligen got a large monthly retainer, though it’s unclear exactly what work he did for the money or how much he received. Friends said it ran into the millions of dollars.

A Trafigura spokesman declined to comment. The company eventually paid $198 million to Ivory Coast officials. The executives were released in February 2007, and payments to Halligen stopped.

But up to that point, money was pouring into Halligen’s corporate account, and he was spending it just as fast.

Halligen bought a $1.7 million house with swimming pool in Great Falls. (The indictment charges that he bought the house the day after Trafigura transferred $2.1 million to him to cover his expenses.)

Halligen was already living in a $6,800-a-month rented house in Georgetown, and yet, at the same time, he was often staying at the Willard.

He was paying a driver about $6,000 a month, usually keeping him and the Lincoln Town Car for 15 hours a day. He dropped hundreds of dollars almost daily at restaurants such as La Perla, Cafe Milano, Martin’s Tavern, Neyla or Shelly’s Back Room, according to his corporate bank statements at the time.

“We used to call him James Bond,” said Robert Materazzi, owner of Shelly’s, a downtown D.C. restaurant and cigar bar. Materazzi said that Halligen was “secretive” about his business but that he was a gregarious personality and extravagant tipper who always sat in the same table near the front of the bar, drinking expensive red wine and smoking.

Meda Mladek, Halligen’s landlord in Georgetown, said Halligen did thousands of dollars worth of damage and unauthorized — and shoddy — construction at her house.

“He pretended to work for the CIA,” Mladek said. “He said he had to have a room that was totally secure, so he had to make new walls, a new ceiling, special doors.”

“He was quite elegant,” she said. “But I had problems, problems, problems.”

The show wedding

Amid it all, Halligen still found time for romance.

Friends said he met Maria Dybczak, a Commerce Department lawyer with big, dark eyes and a brilliant smile, and started courting her lavishly. He bought her a huge diamond ring, a Prada handbag and a pair of purebred Hungarian vizsla puppies, friends said.

Tereza McGuinn, a D.C. makeup artist who was close to Dybczak, said Halligen told Dybczak that he was a British agent. She said that he took Dybczak one weekend for a course on high-performance defensive driving and that he taught her how to handle a gun.

“I thought there was something really wrong about it,” McGuinn said in an interview. McGuinn said that she didn’t believe Halligen’s spy background but that Dybczak seemed blinded by his charm and attention.

In a brief interview at her D.C. home, Dybczak said she and her family had been “devastated” by Halligen but declined to say more.

But on the last Friday in April 2007, she wore a white wedding gown at a spectacular evening ceremony at the Evermay estate in Georgetown.

Dybczak’s family, who friends said paid for most of the wedding, came to town from Alabama. Halligen flew over at least a dozen friends from London, first-class, and put them up in suites at the Hay-Adams Hotel. Washington guests included Koch and Garrett, the Patton Boggs lobbyist, who was Halligen’s best man.

Security men with earpieces watched over the high-powered crowd of about 100 people, and guests were met by a calligraphy sign telling them that no cameras or phones were allowed.

Wedding photographer Clay Blackmore said Dybczak asked him to shoot film only — no digital images.

“She told me, ‘Richard is very connected, and anybody wearing a pin on their lapel can’t be photographed,’ ” Blackmore said. “She told me ‘Richard is top-level and he’s a secret agent’ or something like that. I just bought into it like everybody else did.”

McGuinn said Dybczak and Halligen went “hog-wild” on the wedding, with a huge fireworks display and an extravagant dinner of lobster and lamb in the ballroom, where dinner chairs were covered with thousands of dollars’ worth of silk pillows.

On Evermay’s grand back terrace, Halligen and Dybczak stood on a carpet of rose petals as the minister read vows from a leather-bound notebook and pronounced them man and wife.

What the guests didn’t know was that the minister was actually Harry Winter, a professional actor from Signature Theatre in Arlington, Va., who was hired by the couple to preside over an elaborate fake.

According to friends, Halligen told Dybczak just before the wedding — when guests had been invited and arrangements made — that because he was involved in undercover intelligence operations, he could not sign any public documents — including a marriage license.

It’s unclear whether Dybczak believed him. But rather than cancel the ceremony, she helped him arrange the show wedding. Winter said she paid him $300 in cash.

“It was a wonderful, beautiful service,” Winter said in an interview. “Nobody knew it wasn’t real.”

Nor did they know that Halligen was already married.

British records show that Halligen had been married 16 years earlier to a woman named Jennifer Darvill, and he was still married to her at the time of the Evermay wedding.

“He told me plenty of lies,” said Darvill, reached in England.

Darvill said she met Halligen in 1988, and in all the time she knew him, “I was not aware that he had any involvement with security, military or intelligence.”

She said he left her in 1998 to have an affair with another woman, leaving behind a “stack of unpaid bills” that she paid by selling antiques inherited from her father.

After the Evermay wedding, Halligen was riding high. He spent the next year building his business. By early 2008, court records show, London lawyer Mark Aspinall — who was his connection on the Trafigura case — had invested $750,000 in Halligen’s Oakley International.

Halligen also received an enormous boost from the internationally known case of Madeleine McCann, a 3-year-old British girl who disappeared while on vacation with her family in Portugal.

In the spring of 2008, the Find Madeleine Fund hired Oakley International on a six-month contract worth just under $1 million. Halligen was supposed to use high-tech surveillance and satellite imagery and conduct interviews to help find the girl.

His bank accounts ballooned with regular deposits of $200,000 or more over the next few months. But Halligen’s carefully constructed life was starting to unravel.

Clarence Mitchell, a spokesman for the Find Madeleine Fund, said fund officials began questioning whether Halligen’s work was worth those large payments, and they terminated his contract in August 2008.

Aspinall, meanwhile, was becoming increasingly suspicious of what became of his $750,000 investment, and court records state that he made at least two trips to Washington to question Halligen.

By September 2008, the McCann contract was canceled, Halligen’s debts were mounting and his reputation was sinking. His relationship with Dybczak was over, and he was preparing his exit from Washington.

His corporate bank records show that in September, October and November 2008, Halligen drained $800,000 from his D.C. account and wired much of that overseas. He sold the Great Falls house. By November, his Washington bank account was overdrawn by $1,400. And Halligen was gone.

His former friends started looking for him and investigating his finances and background. They contacted the FBI. And they also started filing civil suits.

Aspinall filed suit in Washington to recover his investment in Oakley, and a judge ordered Halligen to pay back $871,000.

Halligen was also sued by another Washington insider, Andre Hollis, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for counternarcotics, who had given a toast at the Evermay wedding.

Hollis, a lawyer who once worked as legal counsel to the House of Representatives and as senior adviser to Afghanistan’s Ministry of Counter Narcotics, sued Halligen in Fairfax Country (Va.) Circuit Court for $2.35 million.

Hollis alleged that Halligen hired him as chief executive of Oakley International and that Hollis bought an ownership stake in the company. He said that the investment turned out to be worthless and that Halligen drained the company’s accounts. A judge ordered Halligen to pay Hollis more than $5.7 million in damages.

As investigators pursued Halligen, they found yet another surprise. They unearthed documents suggesting that the silver-tongued Brit had actually been born in Ireland.

In November 2009, after a year on the run, Halligen was jailed after being arrested at a luxury hotel in Oxford, England. The bartender there recalled that Halligen had been staying at the hotel for weeks under an alias, with a girlfriend, running up huge bar tabs, buying drinks for the staff and spinning tales of life as a spy.

Staff researcher Jennifer Jenkins and special correspondent Karla Adam in London contributed to this report.

BDN Maine Politics online June 10th, 2012



Hardlinemarxist | 10/06/2012 at 9:13 pm |


Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 59
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Why didn't the McCanns sue Halligen?

Post  mara thon on Thu 26 Jul - 12:46

Something I asked quite some time ago panda..............why haven't the Mccanns ever sued this man? In fact why is he rarely, if ever, mentioned re the Mccann case?

mara thon
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 7063
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-08-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Why didn't the McCanns sue Halligen?

Post  Keela on Thu 26 Jul - 12:52

mara thon wrote:Something I asked quite some time ago panda..............why haven't the Mccanns ever sued this man? In fact why is he rarely, if ever, mentioned re the Mccann case?


Couldn't possibly be because the Mccanns needed some money cleaning and this was the guy to do it?

Keela
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 2304
Age : 63
Location : Darkened room, hoping for the best.
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-08-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Why didn't the McCanns sue Halligen?

Post  Panda on Thu 26 Jul - 14:43

Keela wrote:
mara thon wrote:Something I asked quite some time ago panda..............why haven't the Mccanns ever sued this man? In fact why is he rarely, if ever, mentioned re the Mccann case?


Couldn't possibly be because the Mccanns needed some money cleaning and this was the guy to do it?


Keela, you took the words right out of my mouth. I remember Clarence being asked that question by a Reporter and Clarence said "the matter is closed."

Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 59
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Why didn't the McCanns sue Halligen?

Post  James on Thu 26 Jul - 14:52

Perhaps the McCanns consulted their lawyers Carter Ruck on the chance of success in any legal action and were advised that success was unlikely. We do not know the terms of the contract - unless some or all fees were to be returned by a certain date if she wasn't found dead or alive, then the fact that halligen didn't find her and seems to have been utterly incompetent is not possibly relevant.

I believe the Mccanns knew she was dead. they wanted to make as much money as possible from their daughter. They would not therefore want a firm experienced in missing persons. You'd want someone who had no experience and whose incompetence you could rely on. Halligen might not have been paid the figures claimed - could be misinformation from the mccanns/clarence.

James
Reg Member
Reg Member

Male
Number of posts : 155
Location : UK
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2011-07-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Why didn't the McCanns sue Halligen?

Post  Panda on Thu 26 Jul - 15:02

James wrote:Perhaps the McCanns consulted their lawyers Carter Ruck on the chance of success in any legal action and were advised that success was unlikely. We do not know the terms of the contract - unless some or all fees were to be returned by a certain date if she wasn't found dead or alive, then the fact that halligen didn't find her and seems to have been utterly incompetent is not possibly relevant.

I believe the Mccanns knew she was dead. they wanted to make as much money as possible from their daughter. They would not therefore want a firm experienced in missing persons. You'd want someone who had no experience and whose incompetence you could rely on. Halligen might not have been paid the figures claimed - could be misinformation from the mccanns/clarence.

Hi James, I think anyone who has made a donation to the Fund would have been quite justified in asking why Halligen's "credentials" weren't checked out
before he was hired. Metodo 3 were interviewed by ABCes some time ago and said they never received the sums quoted by the British Press but only
E160,000 + E 4,000 Expenses for 6 months work. The Chairman John McCann promised transparency, yet there is no breakdown of expenses in the
Accounts , just all lumped together , poor accounting when you think the Fund had over £1 million in the Bank from donations within a few months.

Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 59
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Why didn't the McCanns sue Halligen?

Post  fred on Thu 26 Jul - 18:30

The Mccanns hired this man, as they knew it would be picked up by the press. ie. "The Mccanns are leaving no stone unturned, and as the Portuguese police are bungling incompetents" they have to hire a private firm, your average Sun/Daily Mail reader will just go with the story, and not question it at all, they just go with the flow. If Gerry McCann said eating your own shit was a clue to living a healthier life style it would have been picked up and printed all over the world as Gospel!!!

fred
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 4845
Location : Dining in my back garden
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-08-25

Back to top Go down

as above

Post  halfamo on Thu 26 Jul - 18:55

The question is how did they hear of Oakley international and why did they hire them Gerry being such a man o0f the world you would have thought he would have been more careful.As for the British press they have drooled over almost every word these two have uttered , is investigative journalism dead? .

halfamo
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 1905
Age : 70
Location : west Midlands UK
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-06-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Why didn't the McCanns sue Halligen?

Post  Panda on Thu 26 Jul - 19:00

fred wrote:The Mccanns hired this man, as they knew it would be picked up by the press. ie. "The Mccanns are leaving no stone unturned, and as the Portuguese police are bungling incompetents" they have to hire a private firm, your average Sun/Daily Mail reader will just go with the story, and not question it at all, they just go with the flow. If Gerry McCann said eating your own shit was a clue to living a healthier life style it would have been picked up and printed all over the world as Gospel!!!

It just makes you wonder how the McCanns managed, and still do, to fool everyone. How long was Eddie employed by them yet never came up with any
suspects . I remember when his Partner retired through ill health that he said he would never reveal what he knew about Kate...strange remark.!!!

Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 59
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Why didn't the McCanns sue Halligen?

Post  fred on Thu 26 Jul - 19:12

Panda wrote:
fred wrote:The Mccanns hired this man, as they knew it would be picked up by the press. ie. "The Mccanns are leaving no stone unturned, and as the Portuguese police are bungling incompetents" they have to hire a private firm, your average Sun/Daily Mail reader will just go with the story, and not question it at all, they just go with the flow. If Gerry McCann said eating your own shit was a clue to living a healthier life style it would have been picked up and printed all over the world as Gospel!!!

It just makes you wonder how the McCanns managed, and still do, to fool everyone. How long was Eddie employed by them yet never came up with any
suspects . I remember when his Partner retired through ill health that he said he would never reveal what he knew about Kate...strange remark.!!!

We all know about this as we are of course "nutters" we follow and remember the stories that have been printed, your average Joe Public just reads the Mail or Sun or watches Sky news with their xenophobic remarks about the police etc. and that sticks in their minds

fred
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Number of posts : 4845
Location : Dining in my back garden
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-08-25

Back to top Go down

Re: Why didn't the McCanns sue Halligen?

Post  Panda on Thu 26 Jul - 19:16

halfamo wrote:The question is how did they hear of Oakley international and why did they hire them Gerry being such a man o0f the world you would have thought he would have been more careful.As for the British press they have drooled over almost every word these two have uttered , is investigative journalism dead? .
Hi hallfamo, good to see you posting again.

It was said theat Brian Kennedy actually "employed " these Investigators who are more skilled in money laundering than finding missing people. Kennedy
produced the Invoices for the Fund to pay, making it legal, but no one knows how much these investigators were paid. Metodo 3 said E164,000.00
for six months work E27,000 roughly a month @E2.00 , about £13,500 a month for 3 investigators including expenses.? How many boxes were removed
from their Offices by SY. Of course , because all the expenses are not itemised we have no way of telling the true figure.




Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 59
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

as above

Post  halfamo on Thu 26 Jul - 19:28

Panda wrote:
halfamo wrote:The question is how did they hear of Oakley international and why did they hire them Gerry being such a man o0f the world you would have thought he would have been more careful.As for the British press they have drooled over almost every word these two have uttered , is investigative journalism dead? .
Hi hallfamo, good to see you posting again.

It was said theat Brian Kennedy actually "employed " these Investigators who are more skilled in money laundering than finding missing people. Kennedy
produced the Invoices for the Fund to pay, making it legal, but no one knows how much these investigators were paid. Metodo 3 said E164,000.00
for six months work E27,000 roughly a month @E2.00 , about £13,500 a month for 3 investigators including expenses.? How many boxes were removed
from their Offices by SY. Of course , because all the expenses are not itemised we have no way of telling the true figure.




Oh yes Brian Kennedy there's another mystery why he got himself so involved , that leaves more questions than answers.Good to see you all again too panda .Hectic few months but things are gradually settling down for me.

halfamo
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 1905
Age : 70
Location : west Midlands UK
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-06-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Why didn't the McCanns sue Halligen?

Post  Panda on Thu 26 Jul - 19:37

halfamo wrote:
Panda wrote:
halfamo wrote:The question is how did they hear of Oakley international and why did they hire them Gerry being such a man o0f the world you would have thought he would have been more careful.As for the British press they have drooled over almost every word these two have uttered , is investigative journalism dead? .
Hi hallfamo, good to see you posting again.

It was said theat Brian Kennedy actually "employed " these Investigators who are more skilled in money laundering than finding missing people. Kennedy
produced the Invoices for the Fund to pay, making it legal, but no one knows how much these investigators were paid. Metodo 3 said E164,000.00
for six months work E27,000 roughly a month @E2.00 , about £13,500 a month for 3 investigators including expenses.? How many boxes were removed
from their Offices by SY. Of course , because all the expenses are not itemised we have no way of telling the true figure.




Oh yes Brian Kennedy there's another mystery why he got himself so involved , that leaves more questions than answers.Good to see you all again too panda .Hectic few months but things are gradually settling down for me.

Good. You know the old saying......follow the money, if this had been done a long time ago the whole scenario miight have unravelled. Your'e not
gonna believe this, now according to the M & A, NSU is venturing into more commercial activities, selling DVDs on how to search for missing children.

Panda
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 30555
Age : 59
Location : Wales
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2010-03-27

Back to top Go down

as above

Post  halfamo on Thu 26 Jul - 19:56

DVDs on how to search for missing children thats a joke .I'd have thought their expertise would have been in the act of vanishing the above.

halfamo
Platinum Poster
Platinum Poster

Female
Number of posts : 1905
Age : 70
Location : west Midlands UK
Warning :
0 / 1000 / 100

Registration date : 2009-06-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Why didn't the McCanns sue Halligen?

Post  Sponsored content Today at 5:57


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum