Anagram/acronym: NOTW tweeter

as soon as she said she was knocked to the floor I thought.. hmmmm. Then it wasn't until it was apparent that 'she' wasn't on TV anymore did she say she wasn't allowed back in.
No doubt I'll still follow her for a while and carry on refreshing my timeline every two minutes to see what she has to say!!

Who is" She"?

I wonder if she is gone. Last tweet an hour ago was: That's all Folks! M

I was a bit sceptical after todays tweets. If she was for real then I dont think she would be so keen to out herself.

liz83 wrote:I wonder if she is gone. Last tweet an hour ago was: That's all Folks! M

I was a bit sceptical after todays tweets. If she was for real then I dont think she would be so keen to out herself.

She said 'Adios,' a few nights ago.

No, I don't think she was for real.
Would have been great if she was though.

I've really enjoyed trying to decipher the anagrams but as to whether she's real or not - who knows? If she was genuine, there would be loads of ex colleagues who would recognise her if she was there today, so I'm sure she would have been spotted and comments made. Also she said she was using an Ipod touch and said mobiles weren't allowed and then later she said she could be spotted using an Iphone 4. Very clever whoever she is and has given me hours of fun with her anagrams/cryptic clues.

dazedandconfused wrote:I've really enjoyed trying to decipher the anagrams but as to whether she's real or not - who knows? If she was genuine, there would be loads of ex colleagues who would recognise her if she was there today, so I'm sure she would have been spotted and comments made. Also she said she was using an Ipod touch and said mobiles weren't allowed and then later she said she could be spotted using an Iphone 4. Very clever whoever she is and has given me hours of fun with her anagrams/cryptic clues.

The bigger question is if real where is all the "dirt" and insider info that was promised. So far there has been a few vague predictions about resignations and which even I could have had a stab at (one of which is so far wrong), a claim RB had an affair with PM (unconfirmed) and a resigning public company director was an evil man (unconfirmed). Hardly the stuff to even fill one page of the NotW.

Whoever she is.. she's back this morning!

ExNOTWjourno2 Marie X
Good morning All. M

She is going to have to do something pretty good today to restore faith!!

MrsD wrote:She is going to have to do something pretty good today to restore faith!!

I worked out the anagram pretty quickly today which was David Cameron resigns. More of a Mystic Meg than an ex-NOTW reporter with lots of dirt to dish.

I am not 100% convinced either way. She did seem genuinely shocked at the Sean Hoare announcement. And she has been right about a few things. But yesterday was a bit of a disappointment. I am wondering why Hammy is so keen for us all to change our opinions, he/she is starting to sound like Gerry McCann with his/her repetitive mantra. I can make my own mind up, thanks Hammy!

dazedandconfused wrote:

MrsD wrote:She is going to have to do something pretty good today to restore faith!!

I worked out the anagram pretty quickly today which was David Cameron resigns. More of a Mystic Meg than an ex-NOTW reporter with lots of dirt to dish.

I guess if you keep saying it often enough it might eventually happen. She said DC would be next after Stephenson resigned. Yates messed up the sequence on that one.

Iris wrote:I am not 100% convinced either way. She did seem genuinely shocked at the Sean Hoare announcement. And she has been right about a few things. But yesterday was a bit of a disappointment. I am wondering why Hammy is so keen for us all to change our opinions, he/she is starting to sound like Gerry McCann with his/her repetitive mantra. I can make my own mind up, thanks Hammy!

Ah but Iris it's the pros job to tell us EVERYONE is lying - except the Mcs of course!

Interesting and entertaining read here.

http://www.maxfarquar.com/2011/07/the-rupert-murdoch-apology-we-are-sorry-letter/

David Cameron is certainly going to have a rough ride at the Commons Meeting today.....the most damaging being that Rupert Murdoch said David
had asked him to go in to No 10 via the back door, although James was quick to say his dad had got it wrong.

Also, the Protesters saying Murdoch must go and take his Companies with him is not helping Cameron since he is a Friend of Murdoch and Rebekah.

And here -

BBCLauraK Laura Kuenssberg
by JillyCL
Chris Bryant tells me senior figures at Buckingham Palace warned David Cameron's team about taking Andy Coulson into no 10
44 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply

So either Chris Bryant is lying, or David Cameron is.

Panda wrote:David Cameron is certainly going to have a rough ride at the Commons Meeting today.....the most damaging being that Rupert Murdoch said David
had asked him to go in to No 10 via the back door, although James was quick to say his dad had got it wrong.

Also, the Protesters saying Murdoch must go and take his Companies with him is not helping Cameron since he is a Friend of Murdoch and Rebekah.

Would you want your neighbours to see a sleazy old goat like RM coming in your front door?

Iris wrote:

Panda wrote:David Cameron is certainly going to have a rough ride at the Commons Meeting today.....the most damaging being that Rupert Murdoch said David
had asked him to go in to No 10 via the back door, although James was quick to say his dad had got it wrong.

Also, the Protesters saying Murdoch must go and take his Companies with him is not helping Cameron since he is a Friend of Murdoch and Rebekah.

Would you want your neighbours to see a sleazy old goat like RM coming in your front door?

I'm thinking of starting 'Rebekahs Law' we should have the right to know if a Murdoch executive is living nearby.

carmen wrote:

Iris wrote:So either Chris Bryant is lying, or David Cameron is.

Or the No 10 Spokesman.

We heard yesterday that Ed Llewellyn 'filters' information to be conveyed to Cameron. Obviously I don't know if he's this 'No 10 Spokesman', but......

That would make sense, seeing as quite a large part of the proceedings yesterday seemed to be setting him up as the fall guy.

It's said that at some point, after returning back from Africa, Cameron will have to meet with the 1922 committee (of backbenchers). I suspect that most of these guys are very unhappy (to put it mildly) with recent events and how they seem ever increasingly interwoven with the private and political life of Cameron himself.
It's not going to be an easy ride.
And what Cameron needs to remember is that said committee can make or break careers.
He needs to hope that no more damning stories come out any time soon.
Because no apologies for bad judgement calls or attempts at smarming the troops will save him then.

Iris wrote:I am wondering why Hammy is so keen for us all to change our opinions,...

why don't you just ask?

Hammy wrote:

Iris wrote:I am wondering why Hammy is so keen for us all to change our opinions,...

why don't you just ask?

Because I really don't care all that much, to be honest.

Iris wrote:

Hammy wrote:

Iris wrote:I am wondering why Hammy is so keen for us all to change our opinions,...

why don't you just ask?

Because I really don't care all that much, to be honest.

me neither. i'm just expressing my opinion on this twit(terer). how people choose to interpret that opinion is up to them but doesn't make them right. sometimes you have to say it a few times to get people to think. hope you didn't spend too much money on coloured pens.

Hugh grant and jemima khan have won their court action to get information the met have on phone hacking...now that worries me.