Re: possible new maddie sighting????

**dutchclogs** Fri 20 Apr - 7:17

jd16 wrote:
pennylane wrote: I really wish I'd never heard of this perverse pair of child neglecters, who must be totally soulless to carry on the way they do.

Me too Pennylane, words cannot really describe how utterly despicable they and their friends are. But they are here and I am going to fight them right to the bitter end....leaving no stone unturned. I will find that 'missing piece of the jigsaw' that finally sees them get their fully deserved fate. This country was not brought up on creatures like them

WELL SAID jd & penny possible new maddie sighting???? - Page 4 307691

What a truly despicable pair the mccaans they are possible new maddie sighting???? - Page 4 816281

possible new maddie sighting???? - Page 4 157799

the slave Fri 20 Apr - 7:40

So according to the description offered she 'was also known as MADDIE'
And her eye had a 'brown fleck'
Jeez..... no wonder everything went wrong looking for the kid.
If the parents were lying from the off about what she looked like and her NAME for God's sake.
Please may there be some justice round here soon?
That poor child.

pipstar1 Fri 20 Apr - 11:53

jd16, Just noticed on the press issue of Madeleine's details, the brown fleck is noted as being on her retina, not iris. The brown fleck on the retina, being inside the eye as in the film of a camera would not be an outwardly distinguishing feature except with an ophthalmoscope. I had always thought it was on the iris,in place of the elusive coloboma.

ELI Fri 20 Apr - 12:43

jd16 wrote:For the record, the 'mark' on Maddies left knee information was circulated to all the media and internet on 8th May 2007 under 'Distinguishing Marks And Characteristics'....So for future 'sightings' or 'lookalikes' please have a look at the left knee first which will tell immediately if there is any chance the girl could be Maddie...will probably save 100% all the rubbish stories and innocent families being frightened. Why the mccann spokesmen clarence mitchell or 'sources' close to the mccanns or media aren't being responsible and saying this rather important fact of immediate identification information is beyond me

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/P2/2_VOLUME%20IIa_Page_467_prosesso.jpg

Blood Group ~ N/A

DNA Code ~ N/A

Is that normal ???

**Chris** Fri 20 Apr - 12:49

ELI wrote:

Blood Group ~ N/A

DNA Code ~ N/A

Is that normal ???

Given the date of the notice I would guess it just means "Not Available"

**Keela** Fri 20 Apr - 14:09

Regions/ Countries likely to be visited - United Kingdom?

What part of the Uk do you need a passport to visit?

tigger Fri 20 Apr - 14:34

Keela wrote:Regions/ Countries likely to be visited - United Kingdom?

What part of the Uk do you need a passport to visit?

In the bewk I think! Kate says the twins and Maddie had been to Spain, it may have been the Majorca holiday in september 05? She also says they've been on lots of little trips and were used to traveling.
But she had a passport as early as August at barely 3 months old. Surely that's not usually the case?

jd16 Fri 20 Apr - 14:57

1.6 Also known as...... Maddie

This kind of makes a mockery of the mccanns saying (lying) that they never called her Maddie!!!

**Chris** Fri 20 Apr - 15:18

tigger wrote:
Keela wrote:Regions/ Countries likely to be visited - United Kingdom?

What part of the Uk do you need a passport to visit?

In the bewk I think! Kate says the twins and Maddie had been to Spain, it may have been the Majorca holiday in september 05? She also says they've been on lots of little trips and were used to traveling.
But she had a passport as early as August at barely 3 months old. Surely that's not usually the case?

All UK children have to have a passport to travel abroad. They can't be included on parents passports any longer.

ETA I couldn't remember when the law changed and was a little surprised on checking it was as long ago as 1998. Doesn't time fly!

Guest Fri 20 Apr - 15:46

jd16 wrote:1.6 Also known as...... Maddie

This kind of makes a mockery of the mccanns saying (lying) that they never called her Maddie!!!

........... and is why I always ensure I refer to Healy & McCann, not the McCanns, when Posting as that is what they claimed to refer to themselves as. It's not a pedantic dig at fellow Posters, but rather a pedantic dig at the McCanns (sic. possible new maddie sighting???? - Page 4 23324

possible new maddie sighting???? - Page 4 23324

)

ELI Fri 20 Apr - 17:44

Chris wrote:
ELI wrote:

Blood Group ~ N/A

DNA Code ~ N/A

Is that normal ???

Given the date of the notice I would guess it just means "Not Available"

I wonder why it's never been updated.

Sponsored content