The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
+17
almostgothic
AnnaEsse
Lillyofthevalley
squeaker
joyce1938
ann_chovey
frencheuropean
ProfessorPlum
Loopdaloop
interested
Justiceforallkids
tanszi
Panda
MaryB
jeanmonroe
Palmeras16
Karen
21 posters
Page 3 of 5
Page 3 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
Kitti - who said that was it the Judge or Clarence.
tanszi- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 3124
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-09-10
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
Interesting phrasing from Mitchell:
"...ignoring the fact that the Portuguese authorities confirmed there was simply no evidence to implicate them in the disappearance of their daughter Madeleine.”
Not "they were cleared", and "abducted" not mentioned. As if the conclusions of the SY review, probably no track for an abduction,were anticipated or?
"...ignoring the fact that the Portuguese authorities confirmed there was simply no evidence to implicate them in the disappearance of their daughter Madeleine.”
Not "they were cleared", and "abducted" not mentioned. As if the conclusions of the SY review, probably no track for an abduction,were anticipated or?
Last edited by frencheuropean on Thu 21 Feb - 21:05; edited 1 time in total
frencheuropean- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 1203
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-11-02
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
kitti wrote:Finding Bennett guilty of contempt of court, the judge added: "I am sure that
he intended to allege that the claimants are to be suspected of causing the
death of their daughter, and did in fact dispose of her body, lie about what
happened and covered up what they had done.
Funny little saying that.....'and did in fact dispose of her body'
I would off said..'and dispose of her body'
Well, if nobody knew what Tony was about to allege before, then everybody certainly knows now. Very nice of Judge Tugendhat to have this committed to public record and printed in all the papers, now that Tony himself isn't allowed to say it anymore.
It's a bit like the Daily Wail complaining about Frankie Boyle's "sick" jokes. They then go on to helpfully print it again, just in case there's anybody who might have missed it.
Guest- Guest
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
i d0nt think the mcanns have won anything today iris i just read he wont lose his assets etc??so it sounds like he may only have to pay 2000 pounds which is 1500 us dollars ??
Justiceforallkids- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 5102
Age : 45
Location : tasmania australia
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
IF THE MCCANNS, MITCHELL, THEIR SUPPORTERS ARE CRACKINGTHE CHAMPERS TO CELEBATE TONIGHT , then I'm sure their bottle will be flat as f**t YOUVE WON BUGGER ALL, this is just the beginning, imo I've never seen so many bloggers posting on ALL SITES forums, Twitter and FB......
]OWN GOAL MCCANNS, OWN GOAL
]OWN GOAL MCCANNS, OWN GOAL
Last edited by Lillyofthevalley on Thu 21 Feb - 18:52; edited 2 times in total
Lillyofthevalley- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 1552
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
Absolutely, LOTV: But the trick will be to get it spread beyond the Interweb Thingy into the mainstream Media - some good old fashioned Roger Cook'ing.
Guest- Guest
Lillyofthevalley- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 1552
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t6603-support-for-tony-bennett#146884
Acknowledgement to the Jill Havern site.
Acknowledgement to the Jill Havern site.
Guest- Guest
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
IF the mainstream U.K. press cover this, it will be picked up by the international press and that will not bode well for the McCanns. They did not win this round no matter how you look at it. More people will question why Mr. Bennett was targetted for daring, in the first instance, for publishing his opinion which was based on the Portugese investigation. Madeleine's own mother did not co-operate with law enforcement by refusing to answer questions regarding her disappearance. No stone left unturned indeed.
interested- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 2839
Warning :
Registration date : 2011-10-22
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
frencheuropean wrote:Interesting phrasing from Mitchell:
"...ignoring the fact that the Portuguese authorities confirmed there was simply no evidence to implicate them in the disappearance of their daughter Madeleine.”
Not "they were cleared", and "abducted" not mentioned. As if the conclusions of the SY review, probably no pists for an abduction,were anticipated or?
Imo one has to very careful what one says, now the truth seems to be slowly coming out
Lillyofthevalley- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 1552
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
Just seen this on FB....
This on Twitter now, look for yourself....Levi@Leviticus1911 Big news coming from Portugal soon text evidence........wow take alook it's on #mccann
Don't have a Twitter account does anyone kno anything about this??
This on Twitter now, look for yourself....Levi@Leviticus1911 Big news coming from Portugal soon text evidence........wow take alook it's on #mccann
Don't have a Twitter account does anyone kno anything about this??
Lillyofthevalley- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 1552
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
When do we find out about the next step. Did the judge allow a lifting of the stay on the libel trial.
Loopdaloop- Golden Poster
- Number of posts : 815
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-02-11
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
tanszi wrote:Kitti - who said that was it the Judge or Clarence.
Finding Bennett guilty of contempt of court, the JUDGE added: “I am sure that he intended to allege that the claimants are to be suspected of causing the death of their daughter, and did in fact dispose of her body, lie about what happened and covered up what they had done.”
kitti- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 13400
Age : 114
Location : London
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-06-21
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
Lillyofthevalley wrote:Just seen this on FB....
This on Twitter now, look for yourself....Levi@Leviticus1911 Big news coming from Portugal soon text evidence........wow take alook it's on #mccann
Don't have a Twitter account does anyone kno anything about this??
No Twitter account here, either.
But if it's about consolidation of SY/Lisbon liaison into Action, then I shan't be surprised.
Guest- Guest
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
Could it be evidence in the upcoming libel trial - which forced them at the very last minute to heed Duarte's warning and propose a settlement? Evidence that they, slippery and slimy as they are, couldn't wriggle out of?
almostgothic- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 2945
Location : Lost in the barrio
Warning :
Registration date : 2011-03-18
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
Lillyofthevalley wrote:Just seen this on FB....
This on Twitter now, look for yourself....Levi@Leviticus1911 Big news coming from Portugal soon text evidence........wow take alook it's on #mccann
Don't have a Twitter account does anyone kno anything about this??
I can't see it nor access that account, but fingers crossed! If SY have got hold of the text messages then anything incriminating could be new evidence couldn't it?
margaret- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 4406
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-25
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
hope tony gets a hard earned rest noe -- evening all feeling a bit more myself now onwards and upwards x
cass- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 1654
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-05-18
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
Someone on FB have put up a link.....
Leviciter1911 says...".Big news coming from Portugal soon text evidence about to be exposed that nails McCanns"
Now if true that sounds like strong evidence to me
Leviciter1911 says...".Big news coming from Portugal soon text evidence about to be exposed that nails McCanns"
Now if true that sounds like strong evidence to me
Last edited by Lillyofthevalley on Thu 21 Feb - 21:09; edited 1 time in total
Lillyofthevalley- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 1552
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
That's the stuff, cass: The road to Justice has many bumps, but none of them are breakers.
Guest- Guest
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
see if this link will work for you....https://twitter.com/Leviticus1911
Lillyofthevalley- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 1552
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-20
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
what fb -- im on them all
cass- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 1654
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-05-18
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
Didn't the PJ already have the text messages etc with the incriminating emails and they couldn't be used in a court off law....
kitti- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 13400
Age : 114
Location : London
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-06-21
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
margaret wrote:Lillyofthevalley wrote:Just seen this on FB....
This on Twitter now, look for yourself....Levi@Leviticus1911 Big news coming from Portugal soon text evidence........wow take alook it's on #mccann
Don't have a Twitter account does anyone kno anything about this??
I can't see it nor access that account, but fingers crossed! If SY have got hold of the text messages then anything incriminating could be new evidence couldn't it?
Yes, I would think so - maybe what was once inadmissible has now become admissible for whatever reason?
Shifts in the politico-legal balance in one or both countries, perhaps?
almostgothic- Platinum Poster
- Number of posts : 2945
Location : Lost in the barrio
Warning :
Registration date : 2011-03-18
Re: The Verdict: McCann & anr. vs Bennett
Found it now, he/she says they only joined twitter today because they were incensed with Tony's verdict.
Don't believe it about the texts tbh, why pop up today with that nugget of info? All other tweets are pro Maddie.
Don't believe it about the texts tbh, why pop up today with that nugget of info? All other tweets are pro Maddie.
margaret- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 4406
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-08-25
Page 3 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Similar topics
» McCann V Amaral: Supreme Court verdict 31 Jan 2017 all 75 pages translated by Ann Guedes
» Judgement In The Healy/McCann vs. Bennett Case
» Tony Bennett Vs McCann 2012 /Little Morsals
» "McCann family vs Amaral et al Judgment Verdict - April 27, 2015" Anne Guedes/Pamalam
» McCann v Bennett: Court documents in the case can be made public
» Judgement In The Healy/McCann vs. Bennett Case
» Tony Bennett Vs McCann 2012 /Little Morsals
» "McCann family vs Amaral et al Judgment Verdict - April 27, 2015" Anne Guedes/Pamalam
» McCann v Bennett: Court documents in the case can be made public
Page 3 of 5
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum