CRIMEWATCH

quickfingers wrote:Unless it is to reinforce that she was there on that night and nothing had occurred on an earlier night?

(If you quote posts you are responding to it will make more sense when quoted later)

Very good point quickfingers. That would also be a very good reason why they would choose to highlight the 'we were bad parents'. And I personally believe it did happened before the 3rd.

Karen wrote:German version of Crimewatch

http://www.zdf.de/Aktenzeichen-XY-...-ungelöst/Wo-ist-Madeleine-30183896.html

note at 21: 54 Gerry slips up and says "how much we LOVED her"?? I think the reporter asked Gerry what he would say to Madeleine

There is nothing wrong with that as far as I know. I would say this is a hypothetical question, therefore the correct response is a past tense verb.

almostgothic wrote:The holidaymaker said the men made him feel uneasy.

Why, ffs?
What could they possibly be doing near a cafe (presumably in full view of other people) that would make him feel uneasy?
What is it about them that is so suspicious?

They are blond.
They are bare-chested.
They are wearing swimming shorts.

Hmm - come to think of it, I might go looking for them meself.
Purely for investigative purposes, you understand ......

Wait for me, I'm coming with you!!!!!!

I watched the Crimewatch interview again last night ( well not all of it but just a small part) and Gerry definitely said that when Madeleine was born she came out " almost perfectly formed". What a very strange choice of words, this would normally be attributed to someone who was in some way disabled.

That comment hit me immediately and I wondered what he meant.

Thanks to page 129, we know it's not Madeleine's genitals!

tanszi wrote:don't think so.  Has anyone seen the daily mail where it says the sighting of the Smith family where they said they were 60 - 80% sure it was G McC has been discounted.  sorry cant copy and paste.

I saw it yesterday in an article but l thought it was a way of getting the info out in the public dmain without the threat of being sued.

At least it's 'out there' for people to think about.

it seems like maddie was not a perfect child to them

kitti wrote:Now this is gonna be a gut buster for them... Why would any man in a Mediterranean holiday resort be wearing swimming shorts?  what a joke!!!

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-police-hunt-men-2461285

I, really not sure about this headline, it is taking the mickey,  what else would some men be wearing in a holiday area.  gosh I could think it was the bloke next door who always wears swim shorts when the sun comes out, regardless of the time of year.

please can I come with you too.  I like the sound of blond, bare chested and almost naked......... bet they've got good tans too.  id be a good investigator.

almostgothic wrote:The holidaymaker said the men made him feel uneasy.

Why, ffs?
What could they possibly be doing near a cafe (presumably in full view of other people) that would make him feel uneasy?
What is it about them that is so suspicious?

They are blond.
They are bare-chested.
They are wearing swimming shorts.

Hmm - come to think of it, I might go looking for them meself.
Purely for investigative purposes, you understand ......

Oh my goodness, that is unusual isn't it? Blond men, shirtless and wearing swimming shorts in a holiday resort ! That really takes some believing:haha: 

thanks Margaret and quickfingers, good to hear other points of view about it, and quite likely too.

mara thon wrote:

almostgothic wrote:The holidaymaker said the men made him feel uneasy.

Why, ffs?
What could they possibly be doing near a cafe (presumably in full view of other people) that would make him feel uneasy?
What is it about them that is so suspicious?

They are blond.
They are bare-chested.
They are wearing swimming shorts.

Hmm - come to think of it, I might go looking for them meself.
Purely for investigative purposes, you understand ......

Oh my goodness, that is unusual isn't it?  Blond men, shirtless and wearing swimming shorts in a holiday resort !  That really takes some believing:haha: 

Heavens!! People will be sunbathing on the beach next in a holiday resort!!

They weren't german anyway, they didn't have their towels with them.


Apparently the german interview was different because they change the 'missing her at family occasions' to 'we miss her everyday'.

And also, she has changed the 'little girl' to 'my child '

Michael wright being reporting back to them again....

With thanks to Becky - suspect (Smithman) Identified

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151620564212101&set=gm.674740069217345&type=1&relevant_count=1&ref=nf

The Germans put glasses on the abductor...even though mr smith stipulated he did NOT have glasses.

kitti wrote:They weren't german anyway, they didn't have their towels with them.


Apparently the german interview was different because they change the 'missing her at family occasions' to 'we miss her everyday'.

And also, she has changed the 'little girl' to 'my child '

Michael wright being reporting back to them again....

Way,way to late Mr Wrong!

All, EVERYTHING, recorded for posterity.

Pity they didn't tell YOU what they were going to say before broadcast.

Feeling left out you internet stalking freak?

You should be , you might well be prosecuted for perjury, with the untruths you told in Lisbon.

Happy STALKING, you middle aged per-v.

Hiya kitti, was going to say the same as you re the German version, differences, especially relating to answers about how they missed Madeleien. the McCs friends are doing a grand job, but we know that from before when weve asked questions and we find the response in the next appeal, media article or tv show. they know they can come here and see what we say, then they sneak back and report. Thought even the Russians had stopped doing that to their citizens.


worth a look www.maddiemystery.blogspot.co.uk. Is this ok to post this BlogSpot address?

jeanmonroe wrote:

kitti wrote:They weren't german anyway, they didn't have their towels with them.


Apparently the german interview was different because they change the 'missing her at family occasions' to 'we miss her everyday'.

And also, she has changed the 'little girl' to 'my child '

Michael wright being reporting back to them again....

Way,way to late Mr Wrong!

All, EVERYTHING, recorded for posterity.

Pity they didn't tell YOU what they were going to say before broadcast.

Feeling left out you internet stalking freak?

You should be , you might well be prosecuted for perjury, with the untruths you told in Lisbon.

Happy STALKING, you middle aged per-v.

Yes, have you managed to produce your screenshots yet, of the "evil plot" to "kidnap the twins" ? 

Would it be possible for a British poster to transcript what A.Redwood said on Crimewatch? For me what he said was very confused and contradictory. Especially as the photos  of the pyjamas didnt show the same color.
Merci in advance.

Iris wrote:

jeanmonroe wrote:

kitti wrote:They weren't german anyway, they didn't have their towels with them.


Apparently the german interview was different because they change the 'missing her at family occasions' to 'we miss her everyday'.

And also, she has changed the 'little girl' to 'my child '

Michael wright being reporting back to them again....

Way,way to late Mr Wrong!

All, EVERYTHING, recorded for posterity.

Pity they didn't tell YOU what they were going to say before broadcast.

Feeling left out you internet stalking freak?

You should be , you might well be prosecuted for perjury, with the untruths you told in Lisbon.

Happy STALKING, you middle aged per-v.

Yes, have you managed to produce your screenshots yet, of the "evil plot" to "kidnap the twins" ? 

The 3as database was compromised anyway so anything he produces can't be verified to be true.

Here you are mr.wrong I've got something for you.

Not Born Yesterday wrote:That comment hit me immediately and I wondered what he meant.

Yes - I noticed it too. When one's child is born, assuming everything is physically ok, the norm is to be relieved that the baby is 'perfect'... meaning that everything is where it should be etc. I wondered if he was feigning modesty, like he didn't want to say his child was 'perfect' because he's aware that everyone feels this, but the addition of the word 'formed' suggests that he meant, quite literally, that Madeleine wasn't quite physically the 'norm'. I decided he was referring to the coloboma.

The coloboma that she quite possibly never had in the first place; I wonder if such a thing would have been immediately apparent after birth anyway.

I know that Kate referred to Sean as having a squashed head - maybe it was just something like that.

Wintabells wrote:

Not Born Yesterday wrote:That comment hit me immediately and I wondered what he meant.

Yes - I noticed it too. When one's child is born, assuming everything is physically ok, the norm is to be relieved that the baby is 'perfect'... meaning that everything is where it should be etc. I wondered if he was feigning modesty, like he didn't want to say his child was 'perfect' because he's aware that everyone feels this, but the addition of the word 'formed' suggests that he meant, quite literally, that Madeleine wasn't quite physically the 'norm'.  I decided he was referring to the coloboma.

Who, Gerry McCann?        

Not Born Yesterday wrote:The coloboma that she quite possibly never had in the first place; I wonder if such a thing would have been immediately apparent after birth anyway.

I know that Kate referred to Sean as having a squashed head - maybe it was just something like that.

Sounds like the twins were Ventouse delivery!

AnnaEsse wrote:

Not Born Yesterday wrote:The coloboma that she quite possibly never had in the first place; I wonder if such a thing would have been immediately apparent after birth anyway.

I know that Kate referred to Sean as having a squashed head - maybe it was just something like that.

Sounds like the twins were Ventouse delivery!

 
Or maybe the poor wee soul has inherited his father's cranial structure.

That's very unfair to poor old Herman Munster.

Not Born Yesterday wrote:That's very unfair to poor old Herman Munster.

I agree.