CRIMEWATCH

iris i have not seen the show but from what i  have read  this IS    damming for the mcanns because  SY   have said  that  the man  that jane   saw had nothing to do with  whatever did happen that night so there was no sighting of bundleman etc??  so theretically there is no known  sighting of any supposed bundleman   except a father with his daughter  am i wrong??? so SY are basically saying there is no evidence of a abductor in the area??

Don't forget finding the tanner man after 6 years......that's remarkable.

you brave people that have watched it    wonder what the papers will say tomorrow ?

I think I may have to watch it again and take it all in (gluten for punishment).
But I'll leave it until tomorrow  

Justiceforallkids wrote:iris i have not seen the show but from what i  have read  this IS    damming for the mcanns because  SY   have said  that  the man  that jane   saw had nothing to do with  whatever did happen that night so there was no sighting of bundleman etc??  so theretically there is no known  sighting of any supposed bundleman   except a father with his daughter  am i wrong???  so SY are   basically  saying there is no evidence of a abductor in the area??

They have discounted Tanner's Bundleman and brought the Smith's Gerryman to the fore.

pennylane wrote:

Justiceforallkids wrote:iris i have not seen the show but from what i  have read  this IS    damming for the mcanns because  SY   have said  that  the man  that jane   saw had nothing to do with  whatever did happen that night so there was no sighting of bundleman etc??  so theretically there is no known  sighting of any supposed bundleman   except a father with his daughter  am i wrong???  so SY are   basically  saying there is no evidence of a abductor in the area??

They have discounted Tanner's Bundleman and brought the Smith's Gerryman to the fore.  

thats what im saying so in other words the only person in the area at the time was gerry?? is that right??

Overall, I think this programme is enough to shake a few weak minded
conspirators, it did enough to anger us truth-seekers but I think it did
more to loosen the pact of silence. Tanner out and Smith in! wow!!!

jumping between here and jills site - hope that the papers say it how it is - too tired to catch up anymore tonight - what a day

Justiceforallkids wrote:

pennylane wrote:

Justiceforallkids wrote:iris i have not seen the show but from what i  have read  this IS    damming for the mcanns because  SY   have said  that  the man  that jane   saw had nothing to do with  whatever did happen that night so there was no sighting of bundleman etc??  so theretically there is no known  sighting of any supposed bundleman   except a father with his daughter  am i wrong???  so SY are   basically  saying there is no evidence of a abductor in the area??

They have discounted Tanner's Bundleman and brought the Smith's Gerryman to the fore.  

thats what im saying  so in other words the  only person in  the area at the time was gerry?? is that    right??

That's true, and I think they said there were two witnesses that saw Gerryman carrying a child that looked like Madeleine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WyJwns_MTok&feature=youtu.be

Already more than 300 viewings.

Michael Wright ‏@MikeWrightUK 5h
1st class summary in Guardian, by former head of CEOP Jim Gamble of the new updates in Madeleine's case http://gu.com/p/3jhx5/tw

Sky news saying 'McCanns were cleared of any wrongdoing,' and their reporter in PDL showing where the Smith's saw Gerryman.  Reporter said 'a man was seen on this corner carrying a child,' and he held his hands descriptively in front of him in the Jane Tanner Bundleman carrying position.  

Well I just don't get any of it. Is it just me.

is that Michael Wright the friend of the McCs commenting on Jim Gambles article/

And he was wearing what.....


Surely not the same as Jane tanners egg man...bit off a coincidence if he was..

twitter publicity RE: the e-fit

Bloody Hell!  

tanzi I think it is the Michael Wright friend of McCann who commented on twitter about Gamble article

A relative of sorts - if it's the same man - married to Kate's cousin.

My goodness I have never known anything like this, I think everyone is on speed dial.
People are viewing Martin Smith statements at 100 plus views every minute.


http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_SMITH.htm

The Express is extremely quiet. They just have a small article right down the page online.

Someone rang up and gave Gerry Mccanns name and was told to stop wasting police time and was hung up on.

Metropolitan Police ‏@metpoliceuk  39m  
Read more about our investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine #McCann http://bit.ly/1bSimM6  Can you help? Please call 0800 0961011
 
David Steel ‏@DaSteelMan  37m  
@metpoliceuk we all know its the 'Smith' sighting. Why didn't you allude more to what was on police files? http://www.mccannfiles.com/id162.html  #McCann
 
 Metropolitan Police ‏@metpoliceuk  51m  
DCI Redwood: "An overwhelming response from the public, still people out there who can help us with key information" #McCann #Crimewatch
 
TREACLE ‏@TREACLEW12QPR  47m  
@metpoliceuk http://www.mccannfiles.com/id236.htmlwhat  happened to Paynes visit to see #mccann apartment, last indie wit stat 2 c her alive? gaspar martin stat

Daily mail spinning at full speed:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html

And under, an article about internet nutters :

"Others cruelly claimed Mr McCann, who has been ruled out of the Scotland Yard investigation, looked like the e-fit images of the force’s new prime suspect."

kitti wrote:Someone rang up and gave Gerry Mccanns name and was told to stop wasting police time and was hung up on.

that is a disgrace. there is a resemblance. watching the interview tonight i noticed how Gerry's nose is so like the ones in the efits.