VIDEO: Sergey Malinka a SUSPECT? - Watch this Interview from May 17 2007 and decide!!

Why does Kate mention Malinka in her diary. Did she know him prior to the holiday?

Well, he looks something like the description of the Smith sighting (but then so does Gerry).

He is choosing his words carefully (but so does Gerry).

He says he does not rape children?  Why would he say that? (or have I not heard properly).

If Kate has mentioned him in her book, why doesn't he sue Kate?  He only talks of the media.  (Of course this interview probably pre-dates her book, but has he ever said he has thought of suing Kate?) Or was it her diary? In which case he could have sued her surely?

He nervously scratched behind his ear (but so does Gerry).

Was anyone ever arrested for torching his car?  Why the words 'Speak' painted over the burned out car?

If the other two times his cars were burned out pre-date Madeleine's disappearance, what else is in his past to upset someone?

But he says he has no past, no criminal past!  

Anyway, seems both PJ and now SY have ruled him out.  

However, one thing I don't agree on is Kate's description of him as 'cold'.  He didn't come across quite as cold as Gerry.

so is this man being investigated by SY just to satisy K McC.  I think her book is damning on several fronts and maybe other people should be looking at suing her.  but then perhaps they consider what she thinks of them unimportant.

I have just listened to the interview again, I find it quite ridiculous that he should have been asked questions that the reporter knew he could not answer under Portuguese law.  She asked questions about their earlier talk prior to the interview and what he wanted to say.  I believe that is why he said what he did LJC about being a normal man and having no interest in children.  we have very different opinions on this investigation LJC and I have real concerns that much of this is to satisfy leads things that K and G McC consider should be looked at again rather than following evidence.

I agree Tanszi.....I don't think he just came onto the subject from nowhere.

In my opinion, that journalist seemed to be more interested in Robert Murat, than she was in Sergey Malinka.

quite possibly kathybelle. Had Robert Murat been pointed out as being around the property that night at this stage by members of the T&. why of why is all this investigation going on in PdL when SY should be asking those of the T7 who pointed as Murat. surely these people should be asked why they did that.

tanszi wrote:quite possibly kathybelle.  Had Robert Murat been pointed out as being around the property that night at this stage by members of the T&.  why of why is all this investigation going on in PdL when SY should be asking those of the T7 who pointed as Murat.  surely these people should be asked why they did that.

Hello Tanszi

I'm hoping that the PJ have something up their sleeve, that will result in the McCanns being brought to justice. They're not stupid, they can see what Deadwood and his mates are up to.

The PJ have not only had to put up with derogatory comments from the British media, they've had to put up with comments from Deadwood, when he stated that he found mistakes had been made, in the PJ files.

im am so hoping that too kathybelle.

If you believe that Malinka is involved then so is Murat .


Malinka deleted files on Murats computer.

Malinka looked pretty cool to me in that interview. The hand going to his neck was the only move that he made. It was evening in PDL, a mosquito perhaps? No shiftiness about him as far as I could see. Now Gerry is a different matter, he looks shifty without moving or speaking

There was some discussion a while back about Murat and his computer and all sorts of weird stuff about beastiality !

Has that not also been said about Malinka ? He had porn and beastiality on his computer at his home but claimed it was one of his clients.

Going further i wonder how SY plan to reconcile the three killer burglars who stole Maddies dead body and the hairs on Malinkas sofa ?

Would they be live or dead hairs ?

More importantly, are they a better match than 15/19?

Iris wrote:More importantly, are they a better match than 15/19?

Exactly ! The same or Anything less and they will run into difficult questions

No one apart from the PJ, Robert Murat himself and possibly Sergey Malinka, know what was on Robert Murat's computer. Whatever was on his computer was nothing to do with Madeleine's disappearance and he obviously hadn't broken any laws, otherwise he would have been prosecuted.

It now looks like Malinka is being unfairly tarred with the same brush that Robert Murat was unfairly tarred with.

At the end of the day, there is 100% proof that the McCanns are responsible for whatever happened to Madeleine, there is no proof that Robert Murat, Malinka or anyone else had anything to do with her disappearance.

In my opinion, the best thing to do would be for the PJ to extradite the McCanns, in order for them to question them. They should question them as witnesses, because if they question them as arguidos, they won't cooperate with the PJ. If they are witnesses, they won't be allowed to have a solicitor present when they are questioned and they will have to answer every question put to them.

If the McCanns don't cooperate with the PJ, then in my opinion, they should be charged with offences which led to Madeleine's disappearance. In my opinion, the McCanns will squeal like pigs. They will name everyone involved and possibly the reason why they have been protected for the past 7yrs, from the minute Gerry McCann contacted the British Government, when he should have been out looking for Madeleine and would have been out looking for Madeleine, if she disappeared without the knowledge of he and his wife.

I don't think what I have suggested will ever happen, but I'm living in hope that something will happen, which will result in the McCanns facing justice and Madeleine receiving the justice she deserves.