Licence To Troll - Blacksmith Bureau

frencheuropean wrote:When the death halloos ring out from the  forest, it is time  to blow the whistle, even if the poor doe has in fact teeth and balls

wow, understood. damn, you're good. very good.

Marky wrote:

frencheuropean wrote:When the death halloos ring out from the  forest, it is time  to blow the whistle, even if the poor doe has in fact teeth and balls

wow, understood. damn, you're good. very good.

thanks frenchie. good to hear from you. be well friend.

Marky wrote:

cherry1 wrote:

I think he has one, may just not be one you agree with Marky!

he's a troll. disappeared for months until october last year. most of his posts since then have been directed at me. he adds nothing to anything but has an ego. been to told to get ignore him but when you have that fly that irritates well, it's hard.

Let’s get things in perspective here, Marky.

Anyone can look back on this thread and note that all I did was simply reply to, or question your comments.

Your response to my comments/replies drove the posts in the direction you chose which ended as usual with you, having no further argument to offer, resorting once more to sarcastic comments.

And so, on it went until I realised this was going nowhere and so acquiesced by posting ‘I rest my case’. This allowed you to jump in with one more sarcastic parting shot.

And that should have been an end to it.

But then another poster made a comment regarding ‘I rest my case’ which appears to have upset your sensitive nature and been the catalyst for you to begin attacking me and calling me a Troll.

You do not know me, Marky, nor do you know the reason why I didn’t post for some time. And yet you chose to make that sound sinister which I take exception to.

Do I have an ego? Yes, I do. But it’s nowhere near as big as yours.

As for being a Troll… What a crock.

You do not have to respond to me and yet you choose to do so. If you’ve been told to ignore me, why don’t you?
And, if you believe I'm a Troll, why deliberately direct a sarcastic comment at me for no apparent reason?
(Remember your recent sarcastic little gem from Re: Madeleine Police face Deadline – Questioning Portuguese Suspects:

jassi wrote:

I don't see a conspiracy, so much as a face-saving exercise - too many high profile people  likely to be embarrassed if the truth were to come out - IMO, of course

Judge Dread wrote:

And not just embarrassed...

Marky wrote:

ah, you seem to be lost judge joke. let me help, just click on the link and no, don't mention it.
https://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t28654-brenda-leyland-and-the-inquest )

You didn’t have to write that provocative post, you chose to. And by doing so, invited a response, which you got.

The thing is, Marky. You enjoy giving it but hate taking it.

And be honest, what truly irritates you is that you can’t get to me, no matter how hard you try. And that’s why you lash out with childish accusations and insinuations.

You’re nothing special Marky, even though you seem to think you are, and you don’t have special privileges either. So if you post on here you have to accept the fact that you are open to other posters, including me, challenging you.

So please don’t come the ‘hard done by Marky' just because you’re not as clever or as witty as you appear to think you are.

And finally...

You know what’s truly laughable?

It’s that you moan and create about me and yet happily, constantly and deliberately target and intimidate other posters with unnecessarily rude, cynical and unwarranted sarcastic comments...

Judge Dread wrote:

Marky wrote:

cherry1 wrote:

I think he has one, may just not be one you agree with Marky!

he's a troll. disappeared for months until october last year. most of his posts since then have been directed at me. he adds nothing to anything but has an ego. been to told to get ignore him but when you have that fly that irritates well, it's hard.

Let’s get things in perspective here, Marky.

Anyone can look back on this thread and note that all I did was simply reply to, or question your comments.

Your response to my comments/replies drove the posts in the direction you chose which ended as usual with you, having no further argument to offer, resorting once more to sarcastic comments.

And so, on it went until I realised this was going nowhere and so acquiesced by posting ‘I rest my case’. This allowed you to jump in with one more sarcastic parting shot.

And that should have been an end to it.

But then another poster made a comment regarding ‘I rest my case’ which appears to have upset your sensitive nature and been the catalyst for you to begin attacking me and calling me a Troll.

You do not know me, Marky, nor do you know the reason why I didn’t post for some time. And yet you chose to make that sound sinister which I take exception to.

Do I have an ego? Yes, I do. But it’s nowhere near as big as yours.

As for being a Troll… What a crock.

You do not have to respond to me and yet you choose to do so. If you’ve been told to ignore me, why don’t you?
And, if you believe I'm a Troll, why deliberately direct a sarcastic comment at me for no apparent reason?
(Remember your recent sarcastic little gem from Re: Madeleine Police face Deadline – Questioning Portuguese Suspects:

jassi wrote:

I don't see a conspiracy, so much as a face-saving exercise - too many high profile people  likely to be embarrassed if the truth were to come out - IMO, of course

Judge Dread wrote:

And not just embarrassed...

Marky wrote:

ah, you seem to be lost judge joke. let me help, just click on the link and no, don't mention it.
https://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t28654-brenda-leyland-and-the-inquest )

You didn’t have to write that provocative post, you chose to. And by doing so, invited a response, which you got.

The thing is, Marky. You enjoy giving it but hate taking it.

And be honest, what truly irritates you is that you can’t get to me, no matter how hard you try. And that’s why you lash out with childish accusations and insinuations.

You’re nothing special Marky, even though you seem to think you are, and you don’t have special privileges either. So if you post on here you have to accept the fact that you are open to other posters, including me, challenging you.

So please don’t come the ‘hard done by Marky' just because you’re not as clever or as witty as you appear to think you are.

And finally...

You know what’s truly laughable?

It’s that you moan and create about me and yet happily, constantly and deliberately target and intimidate other posters with unnecessarily rude, cynical and unwarranted sarcastic comments...

Well said, Judge Dread.

(I'm a poet but don't know it).

Is there a Hobbit house in the enchanted forest ?

Not Born Yesterday wrote:(I'm a poet but don't know it).

i've forwarded your name for the The T. S. Eliot Prize for Poetry.

Recognition for my "talent" at last.

Lioned wrote:Is there a Hobbit house in the enchanted forest ?

i'll ask uncle john the hermit next time i'm down that way.

I would have thought in relation to what happened to Brenda R.I.P. that people would be more careful before bandying around ridiculous accusations against others of being a 'troll' who are very clearly not a 'troll'.

cherry1 wrote:I would have thought in relation to what happened to Brenda R.I.P. that people would be more careful before bandying around ridiculous accusations against others of being a 'troll' who are very clearly not a 'troll'.

not expecting jd to top himself are you?

Marky in light of what happened to Brenda that remark is uncalled for imo

cherry1 wrote:Marky in light of what happened to Brenda that remark is uncalled for imo

ah, stop being so sensitive.

I would call it being sensible, we have clearly seen over the years the vindictiveness of some of the pros some of whom appear to be unbalanced people who seem to spend their time scouring social media for their next victims so imo labelling someone as a troll is not a sensible thing to do and completely uncalled for.

cherry1 wrote:I would call it being sensible, we have clearly seen over the years the vindictiveness of some of the pros some of whom appear to be unbalanced people who seem to spend their time scouring social media for their next victims so imo labelling someone as a troll is not a sensible thing to do and completely uncalled for.

as you wish but you seem to have omitted the so called 'antis' from your comment, some of whom have been just as unbalanced and vindictive or is that okay with you?

As anyone would know Marky no it is not ok with me which is why I have regularly over the years on social media said any form of nastiness and abuse is uncalled for whoever it comes from. Incidentally the number of antis who act in this way are a minority, the number of pros who act in this way are the majority. I don't condone any nastiness whoever does it.

I directed my remarks in relation to the pros due to what they did in relation to Brenda, they along with Sky News contributed to the death of an innocent woman who was labelled a 'troll' which she clearly wasn't so for the purpose of this discussion I made reference to the pros as an innocent woman lost her life due partly to their actions.

cherry1 wrote:Incidentally the number of antis who act in this way are a minority, the number of pros who act in this way are the majority.

you think so? personally i think it's about the same.

and i've passed on your second paragraph. reckon you can guess why.

We will have to agree to disagree on that one!

cherry1 wrote:

We will have to agree to disagree on that one!

but of course, never thought you'd ever bend over on that one.

I was referring to the your comment about antis and pros being about the same!

cherry1 wrote:I was referring to the your comment about antis and pros being about the same!

so was i.

To be honest not really sure what you are going on about so we best leave the discussion there.

cherry1 wrote:That is what I was saying we have to agree to disagree on.

yes cherry, i know.

No doubt I shall kick myself when someone answers, but who is the "jd" referred to earlier?