McCanns/Amaral
+57
jimuck
malena stool
Colonel Fabien
T4two
pennylane
Carolina
MaryB
keepingmum
buildersbum
dutchclogs
jinvta
Claudia79
Keela
mumbles
AnnaEsse
Badboy
Bebootje
widowan
Sandi
jay2001
the slave
zodiac
jejune
tanszi
Christine
Karen
ann_chovey
docmac
fred
kitti
squeaker
Judge Dread
Jem
LJC
DavidA
margaret
Dimsie
lea
POPPY1
Wallflower
hobnob
Alpine Aster
wantthetruth
ashwil
Lioned
saloongirl
quickfingers
wjk
jeanie
Justiceforallkids
bootsy
contrary
frencheuropean
blossom45
steve1295
welshy
Annabel
61 posters
Page 16 of 16
Page 16 of 16 • 1 ... 9 ... 14, 15, 16
Re: McCanns/Amaral
T4two wrote:The injunction against Dr. Amaral has prohibited Dr. Amaral from earning a living for the best part of a year. His appeal against the injunction was way back in February. We are now starting October and nobody can tell me when the case is to be heard. As far as I know, a date for the case to be heard has not been announced. I wonder how long it will take until Dr. Amaral is no longer able to exist without any income? Does anyone on this forum know whether this time frame is normal for Portugal or whether Portugal is in effect in violation of Dr. Amaral's basic human rights in stopping him from earning a living to support himself and his family without bringing the main case against him to trial?
How has the injunction prevented Amaral from earning a living?
sans_souci- Golden Poster
- Number of posts : 689
Warning :
Registration date : 2009-11-24
Re: McCanns/Amaral
jimuck
I have no information that would suggest what you say is correct. I remember something about the PJ not being prepared to fully investigate Payne because it would damage his character. But maybe Panda or Marky can elaborate on this. It would certainly be a reason why they would be loath to have any reference to these statements read out in open Court. But I don't think this libel action would be the place for this evidence to be aired/used.
Angelique
I have no information that would suggest what you say is correct. I remember something about the PJ not being prepared to fully investigate Payne because it would damage his character. But maybe Panda or Marky can elaborate on this. It would certainly be a reason why they would be loath to have any reference to these statements read out in open Court. But I don't think this libel action would be the place for this evidence to be aired/used.
Angelique
Angelique- Platinum Poster
-
Number of posts : 3418
Location : Freezing in England
Warning :
Registration date : 2010-08-28
Page 16 of 16 • 1 ... 9 ... 14, 15, 16
Similar topics
» McCanns v Amaral
» McCanns to sue Goncalo Amaral Thread....
» What the papers say - Amaral V McCanns trial
» Regarding Snr Amaral's Assets....What the McCanns Want
» McCanns ask for thousands of Euros from Amaral
» McCanns to sue Goncalo Amaral Thread....
» What the papers say - Amaral V McCanns trial
» Regarding Snr Amaral's Assets....What the McCanns Want
» McCanns ask for thousands of Euros from Amaral
Page 16 of 16
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|