NOTW Journo tweet re McCann's protection

Panda wrote:Nor me Margaret....sorry.

Would a 4 yr old child in a creche all day and every day not say at any time, my name is not Maddie to one of the Nannies, be accepted by the Twins
or the other Tapas children?

Kikoratton named this man, his child IS also called Maddie, wouldn't be a problem about the twins not taking to this girl as they attended different groups in the creche.

I agree it's a step too far but why did they come out with the height difference and younger photos, that bugs me and this would explain it.

I think the substitute Maddie idea is a no go. Surely the police would have uncovered anything so ham fisted as that as well as the fact that the other Tapasniks would not conspire to do something so risky that makes them complicit in a death as well as the creche workers knowing who they had and didn't have...

I think the reason they used younger photos is because they were branding her as the world's three year old. For a while there, when people were saying she was dead in that flat (just after the story broke of Eddy and Keela) they kept insisting on the stories being written to say that "the now 4 year old Madeleine" was seen hither and yon - they needed people to believe she was still alive - but the truth seems now that they know she will never be more than a three year old and that little baby face sells. It's biology, we respond to those little faces, big cheeks, wide eyes, flat faces with the undeveloped nose, all mammals do. It helps to ensure you respond to the young and feed them and so on.

It's also a very old marketing ploy. Put a good looking woman, a baby and a dog in the ad and you can sell anything. They don't have a dog but it seems clear Brand Madeleine is using the baby and the woman at least, Gerry's suggestion that Kate pose in a bikini is just so classic of him, the budding marketing campaigneer, you could laugh if it wasn't pitiful.

Kate will never work again, certainly not as a Dr and I doubt any mmissing children group would hire her either due to the circumstances of the "abduction" being called into question both as to whether there was one and to their neglect making it possible. So merchandising her daughter is what is left and while I know you can get addicted to celebrity you can certainly also get used to having money and a second income. That's what Madeleine is now. A little cottage industry for Kate to top up the coffers with interviews and her book about kate.

I also think they had to show earlier photos because they apparently only took two of the Madeleiene the whole time they were there, yet they must have been taking photos of the Group at night because Kate left her camera on the Table when they all rushed off to 5a and Mrs Webster took it to her later.

Both Kate and Gerry are still registered with the GMC. Obviously Gerry needs to be, though Kate has obviously made the choice to continue with her registration. So from that point of view she could return to practice.

widowan wrote:
It's also a very old marketing ploy. Put a good looking woman, a baby and a dog in the ad and you can sell anything. They don't have a dog but it seems clear Brand Madeleine is using the baby and the woman at least, Gerry's suggestion that Kate pose in a bikini is just so classic of him, the budding marketing campaigneer, you could laugh if it wasn't pitiful.

They may not have had a dog, but they did have a (cuddle)cat.

liz83 wrote:

widowan wrote:
It's also a very old marketing ploy. Put a good looking woman, a baby and a dog in the ad and you can sell anything. They don't have a dog but it seems clear Brand Madeleine is using the baby and the woman at least, Gerry's suggestion that Kate pose in a bikini is just so classic of him, the budding marketing campaigneer, you could laugh if it wasn't pitiful.

They may not have had a dog, but they did have a (cuddle)cat.

Very true. I hadn't thought of that. That completes the trio.

Panda wrote:

aqeleega wrote:Iam convinced that the McCanns released pictures of more than one child look at the one at the top of this page. Who is she? She looks absolutely nothing like the picture of the girl with the coloboma used in all the "look for me" posters.

aqellga, you can"t fit a round hole in a square peg. That is DEFINITELYMadeleiene, it may be the photo of her with the Everton T shirt on.

I disagree, google images of M and you will see two photographs of M in Everton t shirt. IMO two different girls, the one at the top of this page looks most like M, the other one has quite a different smile, knowing almost. Her smile is older than her face, if you see what I mean.
Misdirection is the name of the game. Quite possible that both were photoshopped, the position of the neck is a little strange. Someone in their circle is very good at it. The swimming pool photo for instance (G slipped up and published the pasted-in part separately, his elbow disappeared from the original). Tennis girl? Much taller than 90 cm. Looks about 5 yrs. So many photographs show children with make-up on. Blond eyebrows and black lashes?
The blue eyeshadow photo is such paedo candy that it's stunned me. Initially K said it was taken after she'd raided her make-up box - two years later it's a professional beautician who happened to be visiting, made Maddy up.
I would say that there are no photographs of Madeleine in PdL in 2007 AT ALL.
And the iconic poster photo is of Maddie aged max. 2.5 yrs. old with added coloboma (which can be proven not to exist- amongst others see youtube). If that poster and the tennis girl are contemporary I'll eat one of my hats!

Panda wrote:I also think they had to show earlier photos because they apparently only took two of the Madeleiene the whole time they were there, yet they must have been taking photos of the Group at night because Kate left her camera on the Table when they all rushed off to 5a and Mrs Webster took it to her later.

Good point - every photo they had but the one of the tennis balls and the poolside dangling feet was a "younger" photo; at least as young as her last holiday.

But NOW - if the point is not to leverage baby Madeleine as a brand, but rather to find the "now 8 year old girl" why not put the photo of her based on the age progression? Why do they have a photo of a 2 1/2 year old on the cover of a book about an 8 year old? It reminds me of when they do a memorial for a person that was cremated, and they have an urn and the photograph of how they looked in life.

Maybe this book is a memorial.

(TextUSA does not think the papers will dare to print any more fake McCann stories - NOTW sure won't - because of the scandal and the fact that people now know those papers print what their friends and clients want to get out, not what is true - too risky)

-- I know Kate & Gerry had said this was sort of their last hurrah because the fund was getting so low they needed this to get their millions - since the hoped for large figure donations weren't coming in, they'd simply run out of money for "the investigation" and "the search" and this was going to be their last rodeo, it's obvious other people have all moved on and now they have the 3.5M pounds from Cameron they really can't justify fund raising for the sake of the investigation as that is being done by the UK tax payer.

So maybe this is Kate's way of saying goodbye... although for a goodbye to Madeleine or a memorial of any type it sure seems more like a book about Kate

MrsD wrote:order novels - levson (the judge in charge of the enquiry??)

one was Andy Coulson

the one who gets paid by married men - Peaches Geldof

and the singer who cant bear ppl singing or humming her tunes was Madonna (Ciconne) or however u spell it!

MrsD

Thank you so much for clearing that up, I was expecting another sleepless night.

So it's all going pear-shaped now. Gerry, who was hoping for an international Unicef type job, travelling the world finding lost children. Kate, the amazing novelist. Well, they're both still registered with the GMC, back to the day job. Poor Clarrie!

tigger wrote:So it's all going pear-shaped now. Gerry, who was hoping for an international Unicef type job, travelling the world finding lost children. Kate, the amazing novelist. Well, they're both still registered with the GMC, back to the day job. Poor Clarrie!

Kate COULD work as a GP but I don't think she will. She has become used to getting much more money through doing very little, as a professional victim. Being a doctor is pretty hard work and you don't get the big million dollar checks and the celebrity. Which she claims to hate whilst writing a book about herself to promote their cause.

I would not be super shocked if she tried to be a spokesperson - maybe she thinks the book will repair her image enough to get some type of job like that...

If she were offered to work in London I wonder would she uproot the twins from that tacky monster home and make Gerry change jobs too?

I can't believe Kate thinks any woman would believe that a professional beautician made Madeleine up to look like that. If she smeared eye makeup that garish, from eyelid to eyebrow on anyone I would be surprised. Professional circus clown maybe.

It looks more like something Madeleine would do herself although I have to say I have not seen that shade of blue sine the 70's, it's pretty horrific. The make up job looks like one a 3 yaer old might do.

It does look like pedo candy, that photo. That they have it may be innocent, but what's the justification for releasing it?

widowan wrote:I can't believe Kate thinks any woman would believe that a professional beautician made Madeleine up to look like that. If she smeared eye makeup that garish, from eyelid to eyebrow on anyone I would be surprised. Professional circus clown maybe.

It looks more like something Madeleine would do herself although I have to say I have not seen that shade of blue sine the 70's, it's pretty horrific. The make up job looks like one a 3 yaer old might do.

It does look like pedo candy, that photo. That they have it may be innocent, but what's the justification for releasing it?

Are you male or female? I hope the first. The make up, the pearl necklace, the dead stare, it freaks me out. No I think Kate might have done it, no 3.5 yr old is going to get the stuff on like that, she'd have eyeshadow on her cheeks en lipstick on her chin. Yes it's tarty and was meant to be. Kate doesn't wear that shade of eyeshadow and it's been out of fashion for twenty years....So

widowan wrote:I can't believe Kate thinks any woman would believe that a professional beautician made Madeleine up to look like that. If she smeared eye makeup that garish, from eyelid to eyebrow on anyone I would be surprised. Professional circus clown maybe.

It looks more like something Madeleine would do herself although I have to say I have not seen that shade of blue sine the 70's, it's pretty horrific. The make up job looks like one a 3 yaer old might do.

It does look like pedo candy, that photo. That they have it may be innocent, but what's the justification for releasing it?

No 3 yr old child could apply make-up like that IMO - it is far too neat.

ShabbyTiger wrote:

widowan wrote:I can't believe Kate thinks any woman would believe that a professional beautician made Madeleine up to look like that. If she smeared eye makeup that garish, from eyelid to eyebrow on anyone I would be surprised. Professional circus clown maybe.

It looks more like something Madeleine would do herself although I have to say I have not seen that shade of blue sine the 70's, it's pretty horrific. The make up job looks like one a 3 yaer old might do.

It does look like pedo candy, that photo. That they have it may be innocent, but what's the justification for releasing it?

No 3 yr old child could apply make-up like that IMO - it is far too neat.

She (Madeleine) didn't apply it. A relative did i.m.o.

I agree, that is far too neatly applied for a 3 year old.

I have two options but please dont be to hard on me, its only my opinion

Option 1 , https://youtu.be/u-qX9ERql50

Option 2 , Operation Ore

or maybe both !.

Another Masonic mate of the MaCanns

http://gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Leicester_Martin_Allen.jpg

Who said the Masons are not involved in this cover-up !

carmen wrote:If @ExNOTWjourno2 is a NOTW journo then I'm the queen of sheba

carmen AKA "Queen of Sheba"

She has just tweeted that a 3rd person has been arrested along with Brooks and Turner!!!
also they are going to be informing us of something v interesting tomorrow, this person knows their stuff imo

--------------------------------------------
natasharadical Natasha
I'm following @ExNOTWjourno2 for gossip. She's made accurate predictions so far & is apparently tweeting an interesting secret tomorrow.
1 hour ago »

larathom Lara Thom
Too many co-incidences not to have some inside knowledge. I think @ExNOTWjourno2 has earned her stripes. Definitely worth following.
1 hour ago

EdScottLondon Ed Scott
Pretty much everything so far in the NI scandal has been leaked or hinted at the day before by @ExNOTWjourno2 Take a bow sir (or madam).
1 hour ago

buildersbum wrote:

carmen wrote:If @ExNOTWjourno2 is a NOTW journo then I'm the queen of sheba

carmen AKA "Queen of Sheba"

She has just tweeted that a 3rd person has been arrested along with Brooks and Turner!!!
also they are going to be informing us of something v interesting tomorrow, this person knows their stuff imo

--------------------------------------------
natasharadical Natasha
I'm following @ExNOTWjourno2 for gossip. She's made accurate predictions so far & is apparently tweeting an interesting secret tomorrow.
1 hour ago »

larathom Lara Thom
Too many co-incidences not to have some inside knowledge. I think @ExNOTWjourno2 has earned her stripes. Definitely worth following.
1 hour ago

EdScottLondon Ed Scott
Pretty much everything so far in the NI scandal has been leaked or hinted at the day before by @ExNOTWjourno2 Take a bow sir (or madam).
1 hour ago

Hi BB - many thanks, but I still think you may be a bit premature haven't seen anything leaked that wasn't already 'on the cards'

I agree but who ever it is is well ahead of the News media getting it out......

georgedillon George Dillon
After early skepticism, I'm now convinced @ExNOTWjourno2 is 100% worth a follow, as they seem to be at least half an hour ahead of the news

It's being tweeted that the Serious Fraud Office has opened an investigation into NI, and notwjourno2 has said a second arrest has been made today, the truth on that will out l guess!

The mcs are quiet because they're bricking it IMO.

margaret wrote:It's being tweeted that the Serious Fraud Office has opened an investigation into NI, and notwjourno2 has said a second arrest has been made today, the truth on that will out l guess!

The mcs are quiet because they're bricking it IMO.

FRAUD? WHAT FRAUD?

Badboy wrote:

margaret wrote:It's being tweeted that the Serious Fraud Office has opened an investigation into NI, and notwjourno2 has said a second arrest has been made today, the truth on that will out l guess!

The mcs are quiet because they're bricking it IMO.

FRAUD? WHAT FRAUD?

About NI paying policemen for info, l'll see if l can find it

exnotwjourno2's been on about the Mcs and tweeted these:

ExNOTWjourno2 Marie X
A Pair Of Blue Eyes... M
6 minutes ago

ExNOTWjourno2 Marie X
What M did Next... Living Every Second. M
42 minutes ago

Surely not Maddie???

margaret wrote:exnotwjourno2's been on about the Mcs and tweeted these:

ExNOTWjourno2 Marie X
A Pair Of Blue Eyes... M
6 minutes ago

ExNOTWjourno2 Marie X
What M did Next... Living Every Second. M
42 minutes ago

Surely not Maddie???

I think she's talking about herself when she says M.