NOTW Journo tweet re McCann's protection

Supersal wrote:ExNOTWjourno2
What can I say about Clarence Mitchell.... Crook? M

Is this from today?

Supersal wrote:ExNOTWjourno2
What can I say about Clarence Mitchell.... Crook? M

Is this from today?

Yup, about an hour ago.

Supersal wrote: Supersal wrote:ExNOTWjourno2
What can I say about Clarence Mitchell.... Crook? M

Is this from today?

Yup, about an hour ago.

Hi Supersal, Do you have a link or can I just go on Twitter?
What do I search? Thankyou in advance.

Go on twitter and do 'find people' and type in exnotwjourno2. Then press follow.

Assuming she's authentic (no reason to doubt her) she's a notw journalist who lost her job at the weekend. She's been a prolific tweeter since then and she's let lots of things out which have subsequently proved to be true. She says there's LOTS more to come out! And she's mentioned McCanns several times as well as 'Laz' and Mitchell. To see all her tweets, click on her profile.

She's not tweeting at the moment though...must have gone shopping!

Supersal wrote:Go on twitter and do 'find people' and type in exnotwjourno2. Then press follow.

Assuming she's authentic (no reason to doubt her) she's a notw journalist who lost her job at the weekend. She's been a prolific tweeter since then and she's let lots of things out which have subsequently proved to be true. She says there's LOTS more to come out! And she's mentioned McCanns several times as well as 'Laz' and Mitchell. To see all her tweets, click on her profile.

She's not tweeting at the moment though...must have gone shopping!

Her latest tweet seems to have been 'Adios.'

AnnaEsse wrote:

Supersal wrote:Go on twitter and do 'find people' and type in exnotwjourno2. Then press follow.

Assuming she's authentic (no reason to doubt her) she's a notw journalist who lost her job at the weekend. She's been a prolific tweeter since then and she's let lots of things out which have subsequently proved to be true. She says there's LOTS more to come out! And she's mentioned McCanns several times as well as 'Laz' and Mitchell. To see all her tweets, click on her profile.

She's not tweeting at the moment though...must have gone shopping!

Her latest tweet seems to have been 'Adios.'

Is this what she said? Could you please quote it.

Carolina wrote:

AnnaEsse wrote:

Supersal wrote:Go on twitter and do 'find people' and type in exnotwjourno2. Then press follow.

Assuming she's authentic (no reason to doubt her) she's a notw journalist who lost her job at the weekend. She's been a prolific tweeter since then and she's let lots of things out which have subsequently proved to be true. She says there's LOTS more to come out! And she's mentioned McCanns several times as well as 'Laz' and Mitchell. To see all her tweets, click on her profile.

She's not tweeting at the moment though...must have gone shopping!

Her latest tweet seems to have been 'Adios.'

Is this what she said? Could you please quote it.

The latest:

ExNOTWjourno2 Marie X
Adios! M
58 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply


ExNOTWjourno2 Marie X
Breaking News: I am NOT a man. I used to be. ;) M
1 hour ago


ExNOTWjourno2 Marie X
Seriously if you can't stand the heat get off my street. Unfollow me or something. M
1 hour ago

ExNOTWjourno2 Marie X
HacKeD
1 hour ago

Do you use an assumed name on twitter or do you tweet under your own? If this ex NOTWjourno is for real and using her own name then surely she is letting herself in for being sued at the very least. She seems to be giving out information which they wouldn't have been allowed to give out. Wouldn't the powers that be be able to identify her? She has apparently tweeted that she used to be a man. Not too difficult to find out who this is if you are a journo particularly one without a job after the NOTW.?

Keela wrote:Do you use an assumed name on twitter or do you tweet under your own? If this ex NOTWjourno is for real and using her own name then surely she is letting herself in for being sued at the very least. She seems to be giving out information which they wouldn't have been allowed to give out. Wouldn't the powers that be be able to identify her? She has apparently tweeted that she used to be a man. Not too difficult to find out who this is if you are a journo particularly one without a job after the NOTW.?

TBH take it with a pinch of salt it sounds like it may have been a joke and in any case l don't blame him or her if they have told a little porkie so they aren't 'outed' anytime soon.

The met could find out in a few hours who it really is by going to IP hosts, etc.

margaret wrote:

Keela wrote:Do you use an assumed name on twitter or do you tweet under your own? If this ex NOTWjourno is for real and using her own name then surely she is letting herself in for being sued at the very least. She seems to be giving out information which they wouldn't have been allowed to give out. Wouldn't the powers that be be able to identify her? She has apparently tweeted that she used to be a man. Not too difficult to find out who this is if you are a journo particularly one without a job after the NOTW.?

TBH take it with a pinch of salt it sounds like it may have been a joke and in any case l don't blame him or her if they have told a little porkie so they aren't 'outed' anytime soon.

The met could find out in a few hours who it really is by going to IP hosts, etc.

i dont do twitter , so thankyou for bringing news here whos to say if it is fake or not ? if we can see this here all the pros and mcanns can too , some one having a joke or she is from n o t w i expect the mcanns will be trying to find out who - he she is . there have been so many pll in the know over the last 4 years and tbh i have always had my hopes built up , so at min not taking this as true , i hope it is though

The first newspaper that outs Mitchell's sleazy, underhanded tactics, or prints a REAL story regarding what the McCanns got up to on that fateful holiday, will be right at the top of my shopping list... and will stay there for a very long time!

pennylane wrote:The first newspaper that outs Mitchell's sleazy, underhanded tactics, or prints a REAL story regarding what the McCanns got up to on that fateful holiday, will be right at the top of my shopping list... and will stay there for a very long time!

I would place an order for it to be delivered to my door every day!

I like this one. Perhaps G is an aspiring politician

@ExNOTWjourno2 Marie X
If you can't convince them, confuse them. The problem with political jokes is they get elected. M

I'm not on twitter but I appreciate it does have it's uses for example the court cases so I have to rely on our resident experts like carmen and supersal to name but two to pass the info on to us. I just can't do with thousands of messages flashing past...

Are these journos for real? It makes me wonder when they disappear. Surely they would have set up anonymous proxy servers when operating?

If they have the low down on big stories we are all ears. I would be tweeting if I had been in the same position as the journos...pay-off or not. It is a once in a lifetime chance to get all the dirty linen out that several governments have sat on. Let's throw all the rotten apples out of the barrel.

@ExNOTWjourno2 Marie X
"@Muttfan: Clarence Mitchell ex employee of Murdochs son in law should be investigated under the Phone Hacking scandal" Yes he should! M ;)
6 minutes ago via Mobile Web

Pass the popcorn.....

chrissie wrote: @ExNOTWjourno2 Marie X
"@Muttfan: Clarence Mitchell ex employee of Murdochs son in law should be investigated under the Phone Hacking scandal" Yes he should! M ;)
6 minutes ago via Mobile Web

Pass the popcorn.....

Here's hoping this spreads like wildfire!

pennylane wrote:

chrissie wrote: @ExNOTWjourno2 Marie X
"@Muttfan: Clarence Mitchell ex employee of Murdochs son in law should be investigated under the Phone Hacking scandal" Yes he should! M ;)
6 minutes ago via Mobile Web

Pass the popcorn.....

Here's hoping this spreads like wildfire!

I'll retweet it!

The more this person hints at stories the less I believe her/him.

If they are not legit then they should be really careful what they are saying. If they are legit then why not just come out and say what they have to say rather than play games. So far she/he hasn't said anything we don't already know.

AnnaEsse wrote:

pennylane wrote:

chrissie wrote: @ExNOTWjourno2 Marie X
"@Muttfan: Clarence Mitchell ex employee of Murdochs son in law should be investigated under the Phone Hacking scandal" Yes he should! M ;)
6 minutes ago via Mobile Web

Pass the popcorn.....

Here's hoping this spreads like wildfire!

I'll retweet it!

Good idea, Anna, thank you xx

princess_leia wrote:The more this person hints at stories the less I believe her/him.

If they are not legit then they should be really careful what they are saying. If they are legit then why not just come out and say what they have to say rather than play games. So far she/he hasn't said anything we don't already know.

Hi princess, I don't care who she is... as long as she sticks to the facts.... the more dirt gets dished up and spread around the better imo.

WE know all this stuff, but others don't.

Exactly. We've been preaching to the choir for 4 years. Let the tweets tweet on, anything that helps this reach some momentum that can't be backed away from with accusations of this being a few Internet haters/nutters. We have cracked the lid to Pandora's box but it was never really open to view unless you knew where to look. Bring them all on - the more scrutiny the less likely this is to get shoved under the rug.

pennylane wrote:

princess_leia wrote:The more this person hints at stories the less I believe her/him.

If they are not legit then they should be really careful what they are saying. If they are legit then why not just come out and say what they have to say rather than play games. So far she/he hasn't said anything we don't already know.

Hi princess, I don't care who she is... as long as she sticks to the facts.... the more dirt gets dished up and spread around the better imo.

WE know all this stuff, but others don't.

You make a good point, one I hadn't considered.

widowan wrote:Exactly. We've been preaching to the choir for 4 years. Let the tweets tweet on, anything that helps this reach some momentum that can't be backed away from with accusations of this being a few Internet haters/nutters. We have cracked the lid to Pandora's box but it was never really open to view unless you knew where to look. Bring them all on - the more scrutiny the less likely this is to get shoved under the rug.

My only concern would be if this person is found out to be a fake, it will just be seen as another McCann hater/nutter, losing all credibility and any ground made. I suppose if it makes even a handful of people question the McCanns, then it's a handful more than it was yesterday and they can pass on their suspicions to others.

According to this tweeter Piers Morgan had a 3 year affair with RB! IMO, she seems like the type of person who would sleep with anyone to get ahead.