Mitchell ...

But the McCanns themselves say the dogs are unreliable, so must be right then, and the Smiths may have seen a set up, just to convince of an abduction. Ridiculous I know, but stranger things have happened. I don't know, but if we all believe the dogs we are closing our minds to any other scenario - unless she was taken away in a taxi and brought back again at a later stage, having died in the interim. I just don't know what to make of it.

On occasion, it has been suggested that she may have been "given" (I hesitate to say "sold" as money is clearly no object ....................... ) to others in need of a child of their own.

Seems far-fetched, but it might fit with some of the latest debate about the alleged Taxi sightings.

And it would mean there really were lots of old fish, nappies and other detritus adorning various key places.

tigger wrote:

marxman wrote:

mara thon wrote:

Ollybelle wrote:I dont buy it's a cover up. Too many people know the truth. Also the McCanns would have been silenced and told to STFU a long time ago IMO

My personal feeling on this is that if they were suddenly told to STFU it would look even more suspicious, more and more like a whitewash/coverup. As long as they are allowed to keep coming up with all the garbage the powers that be perhaps think the public will see no coverup.

But lets look at 'cover up' as a concept.
It surely means to arrive at a solution
which placates and satisfies public opinion
and all strands of press, police and politics.
But how can this be so? Many years ago it
could be so easy, but in todays world with
rise and usage of the global internet, it
appears to me anyway, that a cover-up is
impossible but a 'peak-a-boo' more likely.

All along this whole circus can be compared to a bunch of clowns trying to stop a colander from leaking....

And yet this bunch of clowns are still free and busy propagating their version of events, apparently with the support of the UK media, the UK judiciary and even the Metropolitan Police. The wider agenda is still being followed and voices of dissent limited to Dr. Amaral and a few supporting experts, Tony Bennett and a few people contributing on Internet forums.

The dodgy thing is why is this story being rehashed and why the date change? If only SY would check all these latest stories including Leh and all the sightings on the Costas. Find out who's feeding this crap to the papers and why. With the sinking ship and the parents of a missing child I don't know how clara has time to hold down a full time job with BM.