Open letter to Trustees of Missing People Limited

The Trustees


Missing People Limited


284 Upper Richmond Road West,


London SW14 7JE



Dear Sirs


KATE MCCANN AS AMBASSADOR IS UNACCEPATBLE TO THE BRITISH PUBLIC


It is evident from many social networking groups, blogs and other internet sources that your charity, Missing People, has attracted an enormous amount of negative publicity within the past few days which will obviously be detrimental to your charity, the work that you do, and of course future funding.


We are not going to make any comments ourselves other than that we believe that you have made a huge mistake, an error of judgement, in appointing Kate McCann as ambassador. We give our reasons below.


Despite favourable references in the media, there are millions, including a number of professionals such as criminal profilers, solicitors and other investigators that share the view of the Portuguese and British police, that Madeleine died in her parents’ apartment and that the McCanns with the help of their friends conspired to cover this up and conceal the cadaver.


The case was archived due to political interference, interference from the McCanns and their PI’s who tried to move the case out of Portugal and into Morocco, and from the media, which as we know was effectively controlled by Clarence Mitchell, ex head of the Governments media monitoring unit. In order to archive the case, all suspect status was lifted, this was not a declaration of innocence, and if the case were to be re-opened the suspect status of both Kate and Gerry McCann would be re-instated. The report that Kate and Gerry had been formally cleared is incorrect.


It is also known that the McCanns had a deal with the press whereby they would agree to pre-arranged photo shoots and offer exclusive stories.


The McCanns choice of private investigators is also very suspect and although they had no experience of finding missing children, they were able to provide a number of stories for the media, e.g many sightings of Madeleine that turned out to be false.


Many believe that these sightings were engineered by the McCanns private investigators, Metodo 3


The detectives were also of very low credibility, Kevin Halligen now in prison for fraud, Antonio Jiminez for the theft of cocaine. Metodo 3 were investigated for wire tapping and Arthur Cowley set up a bogus company, Alphaig which the McCanns spokesman and the press routinely referred to as Alpha Group Investigations, a company which does not exist but is similar in name to the established company Alpha Investigation Group.


The evidence of Madeleine’s death includes that of the Cadaver dogs, the statements of the doctors Gaspar, the interim report of Dr Almeida, numerous contradictions in the statements of the McCanns and their friends, and much more evidence which is overwhelming and more than enough to realise that Policia Judiciari were right to suspect them.


There is no evidence whatsoever to suggest that Madeleine was abducted


When we consider that Rebekah Brooks at the Leveson inquiry was accused of perjury and it was suggested that payments were made to police officers, and stories were fabricated, put that together with the fact that it was Rebekah that demanded that David Cameron put pressure on the home secretary to order a review of the case, else she would put them on the front page of the news, every day, you can clearly see that this whole thing is nothing more than a scam, unfortunately one that you appear to have fallen for.


Whilst we are not suggesting that there are any problems with your charity or its trustees, we will point out that there is now widespread speculation as to whether you have any credibility at all. Some even suggest that you receive funds purely in order to pay high salaries and that the missing people are not really missing at all, or that they are missing but you are not looking for them, in the same way that Kate McCann did not look for Madeleine.


We say this with the interest of your charity at heart, do you really want to be tarred with the same brush as Kate McCann?


From what is written above you can clearly see why you have angered so many members of the public, and bearing in mind that a charity must meet the public interest test, you really need to do something about this to correct the error that is detrimental to the future of your charity.






We are going nowhere and the campaign will continue until we get justice for this little girl, we will not tolerate the prime suspect in the case being made an ambassador to a missing peoples charity when she failed to search for her very own 3 year old daughter late on a cold night just because it was too dark, and neglected 3 toddlers for 5 nights in a row just for the sake of partying with her mates.


We therefore respectfully suggest that:


You remove any reference to the late Madeleine McCann from your missing people website and at least let the child rest, give her back her dignity.


Relieve Kate McCann of her role as ambassador


Remove any references to Kate McCann from your website


Under no circumstances involve Kate McCann in any of the charities activities


Should you fail to meet our requirements, and we are the public, we will take this further and get an investigation into your charity.


Regards


The Campaigners for truth and justice for Madeleine McCann

Fern wrote:Yet another load of nonsense from Bennett and his 'mob' no doubt.

Not Born Yesterday wrote:I really can't understand why the pros single out Tony Bennett for particular venom - of couse it is hard to fathom anything about them - as he is hardly the only person who does not believe their saintly heroes. If, as a certain charmless supporter maintains, he is a complete nutcase, just ignore him and don't draw people's attention to him.

Anyway, moving on to the contents of Mr Davis' letter, it is generally good but the very last sentence to the effect of "do what we say or else" worries me. Leave the bully boy tactics to Team McCann please.

Annabel wrote:Peter Davies?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lincolnshire-11741969

Justiceforallkids wrote:imo this letetr was too far many of us think she should not have been given this job but imo it was no reason to send such a horrible letter to a charity thart may have not had any choice

T4two wrote:It is indeed probable that the charity received a substantial donation which was sufficient to persuade them to make such an ill-considered appointment, but I believe that in the long term it will have a noticeably detrimental effect on donations anyway. Should the team make maximum use of the appointment as a publicity tool, as I think they will, the long term damage to the charity could in fact be terminal. IMO initiatives such as open letters on the Internet and the like only serve to harden the position of the other side. On the other hand, if hardening the position of the people they are addressed to accelerates or increases the damage done, this initiative could still have a positive effect. Personally though, I do not wish to be associated with this kind of action.

Iris wrote:Yes great stuff, well done. How to alienate the charity even further, and get us ALL labelled as nutters, haters and probably even violent and deranged. Whoever wrote that should NOT have put the signature at the end. That letter certainly does not speak for me.

Iris wrote:Yes great stuff, well done. How to alienate the charity even further, and get us ALL labelled as nutters, haters and probably even violent and deranged. Whoever wrote that should NOT have put the signature at the end. That letter certainly does not speak for me.

Panda wrote:

Iris wrote:Yes great stuff, well done. How to alienate the charity even further, and get us ALL labelled as nutters, haters and probably even violent and deranged. Whoever wrote that should NOT have put the signature at the end. That letter certainly does not speak for me.

When I first saw maebee as the Poster I thought it was her letter to missing people and had visions of us having to bail her out from jail.

If it was written by the current Head of CEOP (which I doubt ) it is definitely OTT and it wouldn't surprise me if the McCanns took Legal action .

Iris wrote:Yes great stuff, well done. How to alienate the charity even further, and get us ALL labelled as nutters, haters and probably even violent and deranged. Whoever wrote that should NOT have put the signature at the end. That letter certainly does not speak for me.