Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe - Announcement 2pm today (4th July 2013)

tanszi wrote:does he mean he comes to the same conclusion as the PJ.  That there isn't enough evidence, new or old, to bring charges against anyone. just musing!

NOPE!

Andy Pandy/SY/and BHH (McCann 'fundraiser in chief' ) have nailed their colours firmly to the mast.

Madeleine WAS 'abducted' by a stranger, THEY say without doubt!

Absolutely beyond contestation DCI Andy Redwood states as FACT!

PJ have nailed their colours to the mast.

Madeleine was not 'abducted' by anyone and met her fate in McCanns apartment 5A.

I find it really strange that those on the ground so to speak, all those years ago, including the British Ambassador, had concerns about the inconsistencies in the McCs and T7 accounts.  But  that s ok because Fundraiser in Chief (I like that, thank you) and Andy Deadwood say no she was abducted.  have they tried to do a reconstruction re the timelines, anyone of the two the T9 put together. just asking?

tanszi wrote:I find it really strange that those on the ground so to speak, all those years ago, including the British Ambassador, had concerns about the inconsistencies in the McCs and T7 accounts.  But  that s ok because Fundraiser in Chief (I like that, thank you) and Andy Deadwood say no she was abducted.  have they tried to do a reconstruction re the timelines, anyone of the two the T9 put together. just asking?

Yeah, they TRIED to do a recon based on timelimes but kept falling over each other.
It was like a scene out of the Keystone Cops!
Jez says he was here, no, Gerry says he was there, but it dosen't really matter cos Dave says the 38 paedo/ abductors were EVERYWHERE!

I heard Mark Williams-Thomas on Radio 4 yesterday. He was asked about the possibility of Madeleine's being alive. He said that she had been too young for most paedos, too young for a sex slave and on the issue of her being with a childless couple, highly unlikely as the world's most well known missing child. That's all he said, but what he didn't say was interesting.

tanszi wrote:does he mean he comes to the same conclusion as the PJ.  That there isn't enough evidence, new or old, to bring charges against anyone. just musing!

Yes, and.. That very awkward moment when you realize SY has spend £ 5 m to tell us, what we all knew all along since 2007. The importance of the The Smith statement. Because PJ told us so.