Scotland Yard takes over the enquiry

comperedna wrote:It's also true that the Portuguese 'failed to make any progress'... but not because of bungling...  it was because they were blocked fom making further progress because of British juristiction, potential suspects 'going home', and the UK declining, for whatever reason, to hand over details the PJ needed to carry on.

I actually think this is a breakthrough!!! Think about it, the Review has cost well over the budget of £3 million allocated by the Home Office, would May sanction any more expenses unless she was convinced by SY that a result would be obtained. Since the incident ocurred in Portugal it is right that any Trial should be held there. I think SY have found their suspect/s and need to tie up loose ends before making any arrests.  

cass wrote:wonder what portugal are thinking about this hitting our uk news --bbc online ? wonder if a statement will be made - until then i think its a load of bullshit

Loopdaloop wrote:

Chris wrote:

Loopdaloop wrote:Why are people here getting distracted by what the 'journalists' have written? 
Ignore all the crap that they always write around the outside because they are scared of being sued and look at the content. 

This is actually a positive development! A "full scale Scotland yard investigation" is missing the key word that is used whenever those five words are normally used together. 'CRIMINAL'. Logically, this must mean they have 'people of interest' who are British and accessible. Furthermore, as it is reported that Scotland Yard has taken over from the 'Portugese', that means they now have been authorised to use their powers to press charges! 

they have the right to investigate and prosecute any British suspects who might be linked to Madeleine’s disappearance.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2342030/Scotland-Yard-takes-inquiry-Maddies-disappearance-Portuguese-police-fail-make-breakthrough-years.html#ixzz2WHOeluE3 

How many British suspects who might be linked to Madeleine's disappearance can you name?

They must also be concrete suspects and tangible to the police as they can't get authorisation for further funding on the basis of the psychics and conman that the Mccann's were utilising.

The bit in bold is not true. Only very limited offences committed abroad by UK nationals are triable in England and Wales. Excluding the unlikely offences of fraud, terrorism etc it would only leave sex offences against a child or murder/manslaughter. The Mail's sweeping statement is BS.

One might argue, that they are correct in this particular incidence and that SY feel that this could possibly be sex offences against a child (Gaspar statement RE: David Payne + Yvonne Martin's 'recognition' of DP) or even manslaughter, based upon the drugging of a child and it injuring itself and falling on the floor. [though it could also be sex offences against a child if the mythical pedo took her  the roll eyes smiley]

I would also say to you that 'fraud' in this instance is not 'unlikely' considering the deception that has been played out to damage another individual (Amaral, Bennett, Pat Brown) as well as a deception that has created vast personal gain (the fund). If the Mccann's ever faced charges, I'm sure fraud would be very much near the top of the list.

Chris wrote:

Loopdaloop wrote:

Chris wrote:

Loopdaloop wrote:Why are people here getting distracted by what the 'journalists' have written? 
Ignore all the crap that they always write around the outside because they are scared of being sued and look at the content. 

This is actually a positive development! A "full scale Scotland yard investigation" is missing the key word that is used whenever those five words are normally used together. 'CRIMINAL'. Logically, this must mean they have 'people of interest' who are British and accessible. Furthermore, as it is reported that Scotland Yard has taken over from the 'Portugese', that means they now have been authorised to use their powers to press charges! 

they have the right to investigate and prosecute any British suspects who might be linked to Madeleine’s disappearance.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2342030/Scotland-Yard-takes-inquiry-Maddies-disappearance-Portuguese-police-fail-make-breakthrough-years.html#ixzz2WHOeluE3 

How many British suspects who might be linked to Madeleine's disappearance can you name?

They must also be concrete suspects and tangible to the police as they can't get authorisation for further funding on the basis of the psychics and conman that the Mccann's were utilising.

The bit in bold is not true. Only very limited offences committed abroad by UK nationals are triable in England and Wales. Excluding the unlikely offences of fraud, terrorism etc it would only leave sex offences against a child or murder/manslaughter. The Mail's sweeping statement is BS.

One might argue, that they are correct in this particular incidence and that SY feel that this could possibly be sex offences against a child (Gaspar statement RE: David Payne + Yvonne Martin's 'recognition' of DP) or even manslaughter, based upon the drugging of a child and it injuring itself and falling on the floor. [though it could also be sex offences against a child if the mythical pedo took her  the roll eyes smiley]

I would also say to you that 'fraud' in this instance is not 'unlikely' considering the deception that has been played out to damage another individual (Amaral, Bennett, Pat Brown) as well as a deception that has created vast personal gain (the fund). If the Mccann's ever faced charges, I'm sure fraud would be very much near the top of the list.

Iris wrote:well obviously SY and Theresa May dont believe the McCann guff about Hewlett, theyd have a hard time interviewing him, unless they get Mystic Meg in.

Hi Iris, I might be very wrong but I think this is a ploy, to investigate in Britain SY would know NOW who is in their sights and they have received the nod that any criminal will be tried in Portugal. Portugal must be heartily sick of the British and the McCanns so must have been persuaded that SY has good evidence . 

cass wrote:if its true re sy taking over the case -wonder if they re examine grames and eddie and keelas findings ? yep we all know that the samples sent to the uk got damaged - but theres still the big question of what they did find and where -- 15 markers out of 19 - how did they get into the car ? not enough for a conviction in portugal - but enough in the uk wonder if theres been some dna held back somewhere - a trump card ? in the 3as days someone said a s
ample was sent to spain


Hi cass, the Final Portuges Report gave 4 theories,

1. that Madeleine died in 5a

Can't remember the others offhand, but for the Portugese to agree a trial , the evidence would have to be very strong that a crime was committed.
I think SY have got it and it's bull**** that they are going to interview 20 peopleTheresa May and Cameron would not sanction any more expenditure  with the state the economy is in. We shall see, but I feel quite optimistic and Brunt and Murray going to Portugal when they did suggests  they know there is something brewing.
 

jeanmonroe wrote:Did Kate 'grass' up Gerry and the T7 on her recent 'trip' to PDL?

Wonder why Gerry NEVER, EVER goes to PDL to 'feel close' to Madeleine.

Is SH busy today 're-arranging' her garden?

Before the notoriously RELIABLE SY MET POLICE DOG UNIT have a 'snifter'?


Hi jeanmonroe,

SY has enough on its hands with regards to the pedophile arrests and the NOTW Trials so would not bother chasing imaginary "persons of interest" which has dropped from 195 to 20 . I think they found something in the Files of the Spanish Detectives which implicates the McCanns.

mara thon wrote:Worth reading simply for the very many comments, it appears everyone is fed up and very suspicious of the Mccanns.  Oh how things change !

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/madeleine-mccann-home-office-funds-inquiry-125301709.html#nlgsIto



Thanks mara thon - these comments are a nice change from the few "accepted" by the Mail.