Email to the Missing People Charity

susible wrote:

Not Born Yesterday wrote:It may just be me but there's no screenshot so here's a link.

https://www.facebook.com/missingpeople.uk

Oh what a surprise there are no adverse comments now!

Sorry NBY my link didn't work...but yes, you're right no adverse comments, but only 12 likes and comments from justine, pamela and bren...not exactly a massive following..

And they are all quite convinced that this girl was only found because Kate McCann was stood posed in front of a poster. Heaven help us!

I fired off a snotty but polite email to the charity.
I ask anyone who agrees lilo lil (kate) should be kicked out to contact the said charity by phone or email and demand they remove her immediately.

This is the email i sent them

General enquiries
Missing People, 284 Upper Richmond Road West, London SW14 7JE

Tel: 020 8392 4590
Fax: 020 8878 7752

info@missingpeople.org.uk



Morning.

I would like to know why you have chosen as an ambassador to represent missing people including missing children a woman who has admitted child neglect by leaving a 3 yr old toddler babysitting her twin 2 yr old siblings every night for a week in an unlocked apartment on an exposed street in a foreign country.

A woman who refused to answer 48 questions regarding the events surrounding the night her daughter Madeleine vanished from the apartment.

A woman who has admitted not physically searching because she was busy 'working hard'.

A woman who, when offered the chance to keep the case open, refused.

A woman who immediately hired lawyers and spin doctors to protect her own reputation rather than co-operating with law enforcement.

A woman who claimed she was being a responsible parent but refused to say who told her she was.

A woman who refused to take part in a police reconstruction because it wouldn't be helpful, instead wanted it to be shown on tv with actors playing their roles.

A woman who says someone out there has the one piece of info that could solve the case and demands they come forward yet steadfastly refuses to reveal the 48 pieces of info she knows.

A woman who claims she came into contact with 6 dead bodies in the week or so prior to going to PDL which is why cadaver dogs reacted to her trousers and cuddlecat despite being a part time locum doing 1.5 days a week in a small practice.

Who couldn't explain why cadaver dogs with a 100% track record reacted behind the sofa, their wardrobe, a child's red t shirt, car keys and the hire car.

The hire car that stank so much neighbors reported the boot being left open overnight to air.

Who claimed the smell the dogs reacted to was in fact rotting meat, dirty diapers, seabass and sweaty sandals.

Who claimed the body fluids found in the car came from dirty diapers and sweaty sandals.

Who has sued or threatened to sue anyone who disagrees with her version of events and whose husband has said everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Who has used a fund meant to find her missing daughter to pay legal fees, their mortgage, on dubious private investigators, vacations, travel expenses and cars whilst spending a minute amount on actual searching

Who is currently being sued not only by rt. det. Goncalo Amaral but also criminal profiler Pat Brown.

Who found time to take part in her own documentary but not time to do a reconstruction.

A woman who if confronted with the same situation at work would report the parents for neglect.

Who claimed Madeleine asked where her parents were when she and her sibling cried and who replied she wondered if it was when they were being bathed, which begs the following:

If kate and gerry were in the apartment at bathtime, they would have heard the children crying and investigated.
If they had been bathing the children the question would not have arisen so this leads to several questions:
Who was bathing the children?
David Payne?
A man known to like bathing other peoples children and recognised by a social worker in relation to child abuse.
A a man called out as a paedophile suspect by 2 independant Drs (Gaspar) and also the wife of Goncalo Amaral and who has stayed silent on what are the worse things you could call a man (if he can't deny it neither can we)

If they were in the apartment and didn't hear crying whose apartment were the children in or if the children were in their own apartment where were the parents?

A woman who has told us Madeleine is dead when she said in an interview
Kate said: "It really isn't easy," coping. "Some days are better than others. ... There's days when you think, 'I can't do this anymore,' and you just want to press a button, and we're all gone, and it's all finished, and we're all together and gone. Wherever.
But you can't, you know.
Just occasionally you'll have a -- if you're having a really bad day, which we do. And you can't help but think that."
If Madeleine was alive then logically they wouldn't all be togeather.
Madeleine would be an orphan.
It shows suicidal tendencies and begs the question if she were to face charges would the twins be at risk of harm?

These are the questions:


1. On May 3 2007, around 22:00, when you entered the apartment, what did you see? What did you do? Where did you look? What did you touch?

2. Did you search inside the bedroom wardrobe? (she replied that she wouldn’t answer)

3. (shown 2 photographs of her bedroom wardrobe) Can you describe its contents?

4. Why had the curtain behind the sofa in front of the side window (whose photo was shown to her) been tampered with? Did somebody go behind that sofa?

5. How long did your search of the apartment take after you detected your daughter Madeleine’s disappearance?

6. Why did you say from the start that Madeleine had been abducted?

7. Assuming Madeleine had been abducted, why did you leave the twins home alone to go to the ‘Tapas’ and raise the alarm? Because the supposed abductor could still be in the apartment.

8. Why didn’t you ask the twins, at that moment, what had happened to their sister or why didn’t you ask them later on?

9. When you raised the alarm at the ‘Tapas’ what exactly did you say and what were your exact words?

10. What happened after you raised the alarm in the ‘Tapas’?

11. Why did you go and warn your friends instead of shouting from the verandah?

12. Who contacted the authorities?

13. Who took place in the searches?

14. Did anyone outside of the group learn of Madeleine’s disappearance in those following minutes?

15. Did any neighbour offer you help after the disappearance?

16. What does 'we let her down' mean?

17. Did Jane tell you that night that she’d seen a man with a child?

18. How were the authorities contacted and which police force was alerted?

19. During the searches, with the police already there, where did you search for Maddie, how and in what way?

20. Why did the twins not wake up during that search or when they were taken upstairs?

21. Who did you phone after the occurrence?

22. Did you call Sky News?


23. Did you know the danger of calling the media, because it could influence the abductor?

24. Did you ask for a priest?


25. By what means did you divulge Madeleine’s features, by photographs or by any other means?


26. Is it true that during the searches you remained seated on Maddie’s bed without moving?


27. What was your behaviour that night?


28. Did you manage to sleep?


29. Before travelling to Portugal did you make any comment about a foreboding or a bad feeling?


30. What was Madeleine’s behaviour like?


31. Did Maddie suffer from any illness or take any medication?


32. What was Madeleine’s relationship like with her brother and sister?


33. What was Madeleine’s relationship like with her brother and sister, friends and school mates?


34. As for your professional life, in how many and which hospitals have you worked?


35. What is your medical specialty?


36. Have you ever done shift work in any emergency services or other services?


37. Did you work every day?


38. At a certain point you stopped working, why?


39. Are the twins difficult to get to sleep? Are they restless and does that cause you uneasiness?


40. Is it true that sometimes you despaired with your children’s behaviour and that left you feeling very uneasy?


41. Is it true that in England you even considered handing over Madeleine’s custody to a relative?


42. In England, did you medicate your children? What type of medication?


43. In the case files you were SHOWN CANINE forensic testing films, where you can see them marking due to detection of the scent of human corpse and blood traces, also human, and only human, as well as all the comments of the technician in charge of them. After watching and after the marking of the scent of corpse in your bedroom beside the wardrobe and behind the sofa, pushed up against the sofa wall, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?


44. When the sniffer dog also marked human blood behind the sofa, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?


45. When the sniffer dog marked the scent of corpse coming from the vehicle you hired a month after the disappearance, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?


46. When human blood was marked in the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?


47. When confronted with the results of Maddie’s DNA, whose analysis was carried out in a British laboratory, collected from behind the sofa and the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?


48. Did you have any responsibility or intervention in your daughter’s disappearance?

A QUESTION SHE DID ANSWER


Q. Are you aware that in not answering the questions you are jeopardising the investigation, which seeks to discover what happened to your daughter?


A. 'Yes, if that’s what the investigation thinks.'

The only reason kate mccann did not face charges in Portugal for child neglect resulting in harm which has a max 10 year sentence is that if they had charged her they could not then have charged her later with homicide, concealment of a corpse and filing a false police report.


I am sad to say i shall no longer be making any donations to your charity whilst you have a self -confessed child neglector representing you. I shall also be informing all my family, friends and social media contacts of my decision and also suggesting they too refrain from supporting your charity.
You may also find that public disgust with kate and gerry mccann, their behavior and parenting skills and lack thereof will result in a large drop in support and donations.


I would advise you get as a representative someone who has worked hard for missing children such as Kerry Grist or Sara Payne, someone the public would support wholeheartedly rather than a selfish mother who puts her own reputation above that of her daughter Madeleine.

I await with interest your response as to the thinking behind this major exercise in bad taste.

Yours

hobnob (real name concealed here)

to hobnob - just about everything that could be stated, has been in your e-mail . i am going to keep it and if ever anyone asks me why i dont believe the mccanns story, i will pass them your e-mail on .
many thanks

Ditto.

Champion.

Excellent, honob. I've saved it and will be able to read it slower later.

hobnob well done

hobnob wrote:I fired off a snotty but polite email to the charity.
I ask anyone who agrees lilo lil (kate) should be kicked out to contact the said charity by phone or email and demand they remove her immediately.

This is the email i sent them

General enquiries
Missing People, 284 Upper Richmond Road West, London SW14 7JE

Tel: 020 8392 4590
Fax: 020 8878 7752

info@missingpeople.org.uk



Morning.

I would like to know why you have chosen as an ambassador to represent missing people including missing children a woman who has admitted child neglect by leaving a 3 yr old toddler babysitting her twin 2 yr old siblings every night for a week in an unlocked apartment on an exposed street in a foreign country.

A woman who refused to answer 48 questions regarding the events surrounding the night her daughter Madeleine vanished from the apartment.

A woman who has admitted not physically searching because she was busy 'working hard'.

A woman who, when offered the chance to keep the case open, refused.

A woman who immediately hired lawyers and spin doctors to protect her own reputation rather than co-operating with law enforcement.

A woman who claimed she was being a responsible parent but refused to say who told her she was.

A woman who refused to take part in a police reconstruction because it wouldn't be helpful, instead wanted it to be shown on tv with actors playing their roles.

A woman who says someone out there has the one piece of info that could solve the case and demands they come forward yet steadfastly refuses to reveal the 48 pieces of info she knows.

A woman who claims she came into contact with 6 dead bodies in the week or so prior to going to PDL which is why cadaver dogs reacted to her trousers and cuddlecat despite being a part time locum doing 1.5 days a week in a small practice.

Who couldn't explain why cadaver dogs with a 100% track record reacted behind the sofa, their wardrobe, a child's red t shirt, car keys and the hire car.

The hire car that stank so much neighbors reported the boot being left open overnight to air.

Who claimed the smell the dogs reacted to was in fact rotting meat, dirty diapers, seabass and sweaty sandals.

Who claimed the body fluids found in the car came from dirty diapers and sweaty sandals.

Who has sued or threatened to sue anyone who disagrees with her version of events and whose husband has said everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Who has used a fund meant to find her missing daughter to pay legal fees, their mortgage, on dubious private investigators, vacations, travel expenses and cars whilst spending a minute amount on actual searching

Who is currently being sued not only by rt. det. Goncalo Amaral but also criminal profiler Pat Brown.

Who found time to take part in her own documentary but not time to do a reconstruction.

A woman who if confronted with the same situation at work would report the parents for neglect.

Who claimed Madeleine asked where her parents were when she and her sibling cried and who replied she wondered if it was when they were being bathed, which begs the following:

If kate and gerry were in the apartment at bathtime, they would have heard the children crying and investigated.
If they had been bathing the children the question would not have arisen so this leads to several questions:
Who was bathing the children?
David Payne?
A man known to like bathing other peoples children and recognised by a social worker in relation to child abuse.
A a man called out as a paedophile suspect by 2 independant Drs (Gaspar) and also the wife of Goncalo Amaral and who has stayed silent on what are the worse things you could call a man (if he can't deny it neither can we)

If they were in the apartment and didn't hear crying whose apartment were the children in or if the children were in their own apartment where were the parents?

A woman who has told us Madeleine is dead when she said in an interview
Kate said: "It really isn't easy," coping. "Some days are better than others. ... There's days when you think, 'I can't do this anymore,' and you just want to press a button, and we're all gone, and it's all finished, and we're all together and gone. Wherever.
But you can't, you know.
Just occasionally you'll have a -- if you're having a really bad day, which we do. And you can't help but think that."
If Madeleine was alive then logically they wouldn't all be togeather.
Madeleine would be an orphan.
It shows suicidal tendencies and begs the question if she were to face charges would the twins be at risk of harm?

These are the questions:


1. On May 3 2007, around 22:00, when you entered the apartment, what did you see? What did you do? Where did you look? What did you touch?

2. Did you search inside the bedroom wardrobe? (she replied that she wouldn’t answer)

3. (shown 2 photographs of her bedroom wardrobe) Can you describe its contents?

4. Why had the curtain behind the sofa in front of the side window (whose photo was shown to her) been tampered with? Did somebody go behind that sofa?

5. How long did your search of the apartment take after you detected your daughter Madeleine’s disappearance?

6. Why did you say from the start that Madeleine had been abducted?

7. Assuming Madeleine had been abducted, why did you leave the twins home alone to go to the ‘Tapas’ and raise the alarm? Because the supposed abductor could still be in the apartment.

8. Why didn’t you ask the twins, at that moment, what had happened to their sister or why didn’t you ask them later on?

9. When you raised the alarm at the ‘Tapas’ what exactly did you say and what were your exact words?

10. What happened after you raised the alarm in the ‘Tapas’?

11. Why did you go and warn your friends instead of shouting from the verandah?

12. Who contacted the authorities?

13. Who took place in the searches?

14. Did anyone outside of the group learn of Madeleine’s disappearance in those following minutes?

15. Did any neighbour offer you help after the disappearance?

16. What does 'we let her down' mean?

17. Did Jane tell you that night that she’d seen a man with a child?

18. How were the authorities contacted and which police force was alerted?

19. During the searches, with the police already there, where did you search for Maddie, how and in what way?

20. Why did the twins not wake up during that search or when they were taken upstairs?

21. Who did you phone after the occurrence?

22. Did you call Sky News?


23. Did you know the danger of calling the media, because it could influence the abductor?

24. Did you ask for a priest?


25. By what means did you divulge Madeleine’s features, by photographs or by any other means?


26. Is it true that during the searches you remained seated on Maddie’s bed without moving?


27. What was your behaviour that night?


28. Did you manage to sleep?


29. Before travelling to Portugal did you make any comment about a foreboding or a bad feeling?


30. What was Madeleine’s behaviour like?


31. Did Maddie suffer from any illness or take any medication?


32. What was Madeleine’s relationship like with her brother and sister?


33. What was Madeleine’s relationship like with her brother and sister, friends and school mates?


34. As for your professional life, in how many and which hospitals have you worked?


35. What is your medical specialty?


36. Have you ever done shift work in any emergency services or other services?


37. Did you work every day?


38. At a certain point you stopped working, why?


39. Are the twins difficult to get to sleep? Are they restless and does that cause you uneasiness?


40. Is it true that sometimes you despaired with your children’s behaviour and that left you feeling very uneasy?


41. Is it true that in England you even considered handing over Madeleine’s custody to a relative?


42. In England, did you medicate your children? What type of medication?


43. In the case files you were SHOWN CANINE forensic testing films, where you can see them marking due to detection of the scent of human corpse and blood traces, also human, and only human, as well as all the comments of the technician in charge of them. After watching and after the marking of the scent of corpse in your bedroom beside the wardrobe and behind the sofa, pushed up against the sofa wall, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?


44. When the sniffer dog also marked human blood behind the sofa, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?


45. When the sniffer dog marked the scent of corpse coming from the vehicle you hired a month after the disappearance, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?


46. When human blood was marked in the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?


47. When confronted with the results of Maddie’s DNA, whose analysis was carried out in a British laboratory, collected from behind the sofa and the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?


48. Did you have any responsibility or intervention in your daughter’s disappearance?

A QUESTION SHE DID ANSWER


Q. Are you aware that in not answering the questions you are jeopardising the investigation, which seeks to discover what happened to your daughter?


A. 'Yes, if that’s what the investigation thinks.'

The only reason kate mccann did not face charges in Portugal for child neglect resulting in harm which has a max 10 year sentence is that if they had charged her they could not then have charged her later with homicide, concealment of a corpse and filing a false police report.


I am sad to say i shall no longer be making any donations to your charity whilst you have a self -confessed child neglector representing you. I shall also be informing all my family, friends and social media contacts of my decision and also suggesting they too refrain from supporting your charity.
You may also find that public disgust with kate and gerry mccann, their behavior and parenting skills and lack thereof will result in a large drop in support and donations.


I would advise you get as a representative someone who has worked hard for missing children such as Kerry Grist or Sara Payne, someone the public would support wholeheartedly rather than a selfish mother who puts her own reputation above that of her daughter Madeleine.

I await with interest your response as to the thinking behind this major exercise in bad taste.

Yours

hobnob (real name concealed here)

Hobnob

Well done, on writing such and excellent email. I hope you receive a reply to your email, with a proper explanation as to why they've employed this vile woman as an ambassador.

I received a courtesy reply to my email, which contained a message saying "We will do everything we can, to respond to you within the next working day. I'm still waiting but to be fair, I would imagine that this charity has been flooded with emails from people, registering their disgust at Kate McCanns appointment, so I'm not confident of a response any time soon.

Excellent Hobnob!

I'm so glad that girl was found but it had nothing to do with the new campaign. She was meant to feature on the billboards to launch the campaign but was thankfully found before it went live. Phillip Schofield and Kate said that on This Morning.

I have had a reply from Missing People which I'll paste below:

Thank you for contacting missing people.

Yesterday, we launched a fantastic new system of appealsfor missing people working with the generous support of media partners who areproviding nearly a million pounds worth of advertising space. This will help usto advance the search for missing children and adults. I am glad that in doingso we have gained much public coverage.

We have for some time been working with families ofmissing people as our representatives. This was a bold step for the charity butnonetheless we believe that the voice of those most affected by their loved onebeing missing are the most powerful voices, and we have decided to provide themwith a platform to be heard.

In the past few years families of missing people,including Kate McCann have spoken up for all families of missing people and asa result we now have a Government Strategy for Missing Persons and much bettersupport than ever before. We truly believe that the voice of the families hashelped us to achieve that better support.

Today Kate McCann formalised her role with Missing People,for which we are very grateful. Some people have chosen to speculate about thedisappearance of Madeleine McCann. At Missing People we offer a non-judgementalsupport for all those who are missing and their families. We have never, andwill never enter into unhelpful speculation. We trust our partners in thePolice service and always co-operate with their instructions about appeals andsupport for families.

We would like to respectfully ask that the focus of all ofour endeavours is on finding missing people and that the use of our socialmedia pages advances this. It would be tragic if because of the speculation ofthe few we lost the opportunity to find just one missing child.

Thank you once again for your support in searching forthose who are missing.

Martin Houghton-Brown

Chief Executive

NationalMissing Persons Helpline
Roebuck House
284 Upper Richmond Road West
East Sheen
London SW14 7JE
United Kingdom

Registered Charity No. 1020419

Please click here to donate

quickfingers wrote:

We would like to respectfully ask that the focus of all ofour endeavours is on finding missing people and that the use of our socialmedia pages advances this. It would be tragic if because of the speculation ofthe few we lost the opportunity to find just one missing child.

Please click here to donate

Haha, so in other words yes we know it's not an ideal choice but speculation is unhelpful to us.

I see they've also managed to include a donate button, what a cheek considering it was their response to a complaint.

Well done quickfingers and all.

Thanks everyone

Is it true that there was something like 600 complaints on Missing People's FB-page? I missed it all as it's all been cleaned up now. I can't believe they are censoring all the negative comments AND blocking people

I read the Terms & Conditions of the Missing People website yesterday and it did say they would delete any offensive comments on any social platforms and ban posters.

Sadly, I don't think that any amount of emails or protests will get her removed. This charity will have to learn the hard way. They need to be hit right where it will hurt them the most - in the pocket. It's just tragic and infuriating that lots of innocent families, who genuinely have missing members, are going to be hurt too.

whatsupdoc wrote:I read the Terms & Conditions of the Missing People website yesterday and it did say they would delete any offensive comments on any social platforms and ban posters.

That's useful, banning people. What if they have information about somebody missing? How are they supposed to send it?

quickfingers wrote:
Today Kate McCann formalised her role with Missing People,for which we are very grateful. Some people have chosen to speculate about thedisappearance of Madeleine McCann. At Missing People we offer a non-judgementalsupport for all those who are missing and their families. We have never, andwill never enter into unhelpful speculation. We trust our partners in thePolice service and always co-operate with their instructions about appeals andsupport for families.

They are missing the entire point why people are so angry about this. It's not about being non-judgemental, it's about offering a platform to someone, who neglected her own children in cold blood and as a result one of those children's fate is still unknown (well, at least to us). By appointing Kate McCann they are effectively condoning appalling treatment of children.

whatsupdoc wrote:I read the Terms & Conditions of the Missing People website yesterday and it did say they would delete any offensive comments on any social platforms and ban posters.

I understand that they might want to to able to block trolls if needs to be but regular people should have a right to post their opinion as long as it's done in dignified manner. If they are so proud of their new ambassador, they should just stand behind their decision and let people to air their views. If they are so proud why all the censorship?

Iris wrote:Sadly, I don't think that any amount of emails or protests will get her removed. This charity will have to learn the hard way. They need to be hit right where it will hurt them the most - in the pocket. It's just tragic and infuriating that lots of innocent families, who genuinely have missing members, are going to be hurt too.

Absolutely SPOT ON!

NordicInKent wrote:Thanks everyone

Is it true that there was something like 600 complaints on Missing People's FB-page? I missed it all as it's all been cleaned up now. I can't believe they are censoring all the negative comments AND blocking people

Don't worry someone saved alot of them and they're here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/99867333/Missing-People-Facebook-Deletions

You have to accept the T&C by selecting 'I understand...'

Welcome btw

Missing People Charity seem to think that they have hit the jackpot by appointing this piece of non-maternal motherhood as an ambassador. I suppose the next logical move would be for the NSPCC to appoint her as well.

Look at this faux pas from Pamela Gurney on pg 38

Pamela Gurney. Bravo Kate. You have worked tirelessly and all the while still grieving for your own little girl. Not may could do that.

Pamela, why would Kate grieve when she believes Madeleine is alive?

The "working tirelessly" bit is a classic too!

whatsupdoc wrote:I read the Terms & Conditions of the Missing People website yesterday and it did say they would delete any offensive comments on any social platforms and ban posters.

That was put on AFTER they wiped off the complaints.

Not Born Yesterday wrote:The "working tirelessly" bit is a classic too!

Working tirelessly to find people to sue, more like.

I've also received the same reply as "Quickfinger" and I have now replied to Marting Houghton-Brown. Here is my email.....

Dear Mr Haughton-Brown

To say I am disgusted by your reply to my email, is an understatement. I now understand, why you think the infamous child neglector Kate McCann, is a wise choice as an ambassador for your charity and it is money. You know that the McCanns, received buckets full of cash, from hardworking people, pensioners, children who sent their pocket money as well as wealthy people. The McCanns begged for money and pledged that the money would be used for the sole purpose of finding Madeleine, when in fact, hardly any of the money has been used to search for her.

The majority of the money has been spent on the McCanns failed lawsuits, paying the wages of the people who were supposed to look for her, the inflated wage of Clarence Mitchell and propping up the finances of the McCanns and their wider family. As well as other people who like the McCanns and their wider family, have never looked for Madeleine.

Your charity, along with help from the infamous child neglector Kate McCann, will now be using these poor children and vulnerable adults as cash cows. I would love to know, how much money will actually be spent on looking for thse people and how much will be going into the pockets, of those who won't be lifting a finger to find them. How much money will the infamous child neglector Kate McCann receive, for standing in front of posters?

I remember the person who tried to emmulate the behaviour of the infamous child neglector Kate McCann and her equally infamous child neglecting husband Gerry. However, where the McCanns were successful the woman failed. The woman? Karen Matthews. If Karen Matthews had managed to pull the wool over the eyes of the police, would she now be standing alonside the infamous child neglector, Kate McCann?

In my opinion, your charity is on a downward spiral, now you have employed the infamous child neglector Kate McCann. Your charity will never get one penny from me and if I have my way, no one will ever donate to your charity. Your charity has shown how low it will stoop, in their quest to get money.

Yours sincerely

__________________________________________________

Interlocuter, I'm presuming you are lurking on here, under an assumed name or as a guest. I just want to let you know, that I'll be waiting with baited breath, to see what comments you have to make about the above post. On your website "Madeleine-Exposing the Myths." However make sure that whatever you write are facts, you made a holy show of yourself when you tried to rewrite history. The facts are in the PJ files, fiction is in the heads of yourself and the other McCann supporters. Do you get my drift?

I've got an even better suggestion, why not make your comments on here? You know it makes sense.